On Do, 2011-02-24 at 15:38 +0000, Dave Neary wrote: > Now - one Intel person contributed one post to the list. Patrick. And he > was immediately rebutted.
I didn't perceive that as negative. I didn't respond further because it is as James already explained: we don't have answers for most of the (IMHO valid) questions raised here. > Personally I'd have liked to know how the tablet team is working now, > and try to identify places where efforts could be useful. At least for the part that I worked on (CalDAV/CardDAV synchronization) I have some (hopefully good) news: because it is middleware code, I got the okay to move the code into the public SyncEvolution git repository, which I did today. In the Tablet UX this functionality is accessed via the settings UI, using Buteo as the framework and the SyncML implementation for Google Contacts. Because the CalDAV/CardDAV part was done with SyncEvolution infrastructure, it also works via the SyncEvolution command line, without the Tablet UI. More information are in the announcement [1]. Regarding "places where efforts could be useful", there are some. See that email or ask me on the SyncEvolution list - help definitely would be welcome. [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mobile.syncevolution/2177 -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ MeeGo-community mailing list MeeGo-community@meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-community http://wiki.meego.com/Mailing_list_guidelines
