On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Mark Constable <ma...@renta.net> wrote:
> On 25/02/11, James Ausmus wrote: > > [...] > > One thing I think we can say is what area of the stack each of > > us is responsible for - I own the following: > > > > -Panels > > -Sharing Framework > > -Social Networking Framework (everything above libsocialweb > > itself, that is) > > -Some pieces of the core components library > > James, thank you so much for your input. This is exactly the code > I am interested in so perhaps this is not stretching your corporate > responsibilities too far (just say so if it is) to offer an opinion > as to whether anyone in Intel would be offended if I did indeed fork > the QML code currently available under a BSD license? > IANAL. :) The QML code is clearly marked as being Apache 2.0 licensed. As far as whether I would be personally offended if you forked my code - I'd certainly appreciate taking a look at any patches you would want to send my way, but I won't be upset (I'd even understand!) if you decide that's an untenable method of contributing and decide to fork. -James > This assumes any open release date is possibly still months away. > > --markc >
_______________________________________________ MeeGo-community mailing list MeeGo-community@meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-community http://wiki.meego.com/Mailing_list_guidelines
