Hi Andrew, Andrew Flegg wrote: > That is what I'd expect, but does NOT correspond to Mats Wichmann's > conclusion:
<snip> > It went in the spec that way based on what people who worked > on this were told; hoping the discussion will make it clear > what the spec actually needs to forbid/allow in this area." > -- http://lists.meego.com/pipermail/meego-dev/2010-September/005525.html Presumably, "for comment" implies "not set in stone". So this discussion can help direct "what the spec actually needs to forbid/allow in this area". Cheers, Dave. -- maemo.org docsmaster Email: [email protected] Jabber: [email protected] _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
