Hi, Andrew Flegg wrote: > One hopes. So I encourage those of you who disagree to Mats' > conclusion to reply to his post. The process by which the spec will > get changed doesn't seem to be clear: feedback will be gathered and > Mats will publish a new draft? Who has to sign off on it, though? Just > the TSG? Nokia and Intel product managers?
Also, there is another possibility here which hasn't yet been said: This spec specifies what a platform needs to do to be MeeGo compliant, and what an application needs to do to be MeeGo compliant. It doesn't say that only MeeGo compliant applications will be distributed on MeeGo extras. It's possible, then, that most of the apps on MeeGo Extras (basically, any app that has dependencies not included in the MeeGo compliant platform) will not be MeeGo compliant. To me, that reduces the value of MeeGo compliance for the user, but it's certainly a possibility. Cheers, Dave. -- maemo.org docsmaster Email: dne...@maemo.org Jabber: bo...@jabber.org _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list MeeGo-dev@meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
