On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 09:48, Dave Neary <[email protected]> wrote: > Andrew Flegg wrote: >> That is what I'd expect, but does NOT correspond to Mats Wichmann's >> conclusion: > > <snip> > >> It went in the spec that way based on what people who worked >> on this were told; hoping the discussion will make it clear >> what the spec actually needs to forbid/allow in this area." >> -- http://lists.meego.com/pipermail/meego-dev/2010-September/005525.html > > Presumably, "for comment" implies "not set in stone". So this discussion > can help direct "what the spec actually needs to forbid/allow in this area".
One hopes. So I encourage those of you who disagree to Mats' conclusion to reply to his post. The process by which the spec will get changed doesn't seem to be clear: feedback will be gathered and Mats will publish a new draft? Who has to sign off on it, though? Just the TSG? Nokia and Intel product managers? Cheers, Andrew -- Andrew Flegg -- mailto:[email protected] | http://www.bleb.org/ Maemo Community Council chair _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
