Hi Filip, I see that the version I have built (with Cygwin on Windows) has source code dated 29/3/2014. I downloaded meep-1.2.1.tar.gz from http://ab-initio.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Meep_download in January this year. This claims to be the latest release - is this not the case?
Cheers Gib ________________________________________ From: Filip Dominec [filip.domi...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, 19 March 2015 11:26 a.m. To: Gib Bogle Cc: meep-discuss Subject: Re: [Meep-discuss] Frequency-domain solver Hi, Gib, it looks exactly like the bug that has been resolved in git commit https://github.com/stevengj/meep/commit/0640e9f6a2ccfa2a40375a89b5692ebb1fb87efb Could you check a recent version of MEEP either compiling it from source (blue box in http://f.dominec.eu/meep/index.html#install), or installing e.g. from Ubuntu 14.10 repository, where, as far as I know, it has been updated? Filip 2015-03-18 22:01 GMT+01:00, Gib Bogle <g.bo...@auckland.ac.nz>: > I am trying to use the frequency-domain solver for a 3D problem, 25x25x22 > with resolution=10. The output from > (meep-fields-solve-cw fields) > is: > Meep: using complex fields. > on time step 1 (time=0.05), 41.9989 s/step > final residual = 0 > Finished solve_cw after 1 steps and 0 CG iters. > > It seems that nothing is done, taking 42 sec. I think that the way to see > the waveform at a point is: > (run-until 10 > (to-appended "ex" > (at-every 0.05 > (in-point sample_point output-efield-x) > ) > ) > ) > > and this gives the same result - i.e. the solution starting from 0 - as if I > had not previously invoked meep-fields-solve-cw. > > I have seen other posts on the mailing list on this subject, but I have not > been able to find any resolution. It would be very helpful to have an > explanation of this apparent problem. Does the frequency-domain solver > work? > > Thanks > Gib > > > _______________________________________________ meep-discuss mailing list meep-discuss@ab-initio.mit.edu http://ab-initio.mit.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meep-discuss