yeah
ralph sarich.
he asked the oz govt for a grant and they said no
so he went to the states, made millions, they have a few
ford festivas here in perth with the orbital engine in them
6 cyl i think.... the guy has good ideas but no-one here
would support him.
you might see a few concept cars with his engines in
them occasionally at shows.

ryan

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Alford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:50 PM
Subject: Re: Boost vs Cubic inches


> Yeah, I think that is the one I am thinking of.
>
> I thought I read somewhere that he took his design to the states, and
> someone produced a car with his engine. Don't quote me on that though.
>
> Mark.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andrew Greenbury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 3:20 PM
> Subject: Re: Boost vs Cubic inches
>
>
> > hey mark
> >
> > You meaning the Orbital Engine Company? Melbourne Uni are
> > doing some cool research in collaboration with Collins Motor
> > Corporation into scotch yoke engine design too that has received
> > considerable attention.
> >
> > andrew
> >
> >
> > > hi,  any one remember the name of the company in australia that was
> > > developing a engine, that had some things that resembled pistons, a
> sorta
> > > arm lifted the  pistons up with a stroke of  5-10 mm, and fuel was
> injected
> > > with extreme high pressure air to atomise the fuel , and you could
gang
> up
> > > as many of these  pistons as u want, it was set up in a rotary fashion
i
> > > think, i saw it on a video at  TAFE..................
> > >
> > >
> > >  MARK K
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "E Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:43 PM
> > > Subject: RE: Boost vs Cubic inches
> > >
> > >
> > > > I look forward to the new engine designs to use hydrogen
effectively.
> > > > I bet there is some good technology just waiting for when the cost
and
> > > > storage/delivery problems are solved
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Feral Errol
> > > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > http://www.datrats.com.au/
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chalmers,
> Ryan
> > > > Sent: Thursday, 15 November 2001 12:48 PM
> > > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > > > Subject: RE: Boost vs Cubic inches
> > > >
> > > > Thats why we should be pushing for Hydrogen powered cars, fill the
> tank up
> > > > from the tap and away we go ; )
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: James Marmont [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, 15 November 2001 12:15 pm
> > > > > To:   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > > > > Subject:      RE: Boost vs Cubic inches
> > > > >
> > > > > i wont argue with you cos im not 100 percent on the capacities. my
> point
> > > > > regarding the multivalve v8s is that even though the technology is
> > > > > available most manufacturers still cling to pushrods. i love a
fully
> > > > > worked v8 as much as the next guy, but 5.7l is rediculous in this
> day
> > > and
> > > > > age! petrol is only getting more expensive and there is less of it
> to go
> > > > > around. are they going to wait untill there is no petrol left
before
> > > they
> > > > > say " derrrr, maybe 5.7l is a bit to big, may be we should make
> > > something
> > > > > smaller".
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, 15 November 2001 11:10 AM
> > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Subject: Re: Boost vs Cubic inches
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > You are all wrong wrong wrong!
> > > > > Current Formula 1 cars use 3 litre V10 engines. Some manufacturers
> were
> > > > > developing V12 engines until cylinders were limited to 10 by FIA.
> But
> > > yes
> > > > > of
> > > > > course they are multivalve (upto 5 per cylinder).
> > > > >
> > > > > As mentioned by someone else Toyota and even Nissan have
production
> quad
> > > > > cam 32
> > > > > valve V8s too. You can get them at importers too so they are not
> that
> > > > > exclusive.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > F1's are 3.6 litre and i think the rules have recently changed
to
> make
> > > > > them
> > > > > > all V10's
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > From: "James Marmont" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:19 AM
> > > > > > Subject: RE: Boost vs Cubic inches
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > fornula one cars are limited ti 1.6l.the benneton team used to
> run
> > > > > bigger
> > > > > > capacity v8s before the rules changed. and yes toyota and
ferrari
> do
> > > > > make
> > > > > > quad cam v8s, but they are only in very expensive luxury cars.
> they
> > > need
> > > > > to
> > > > > > maked them more wide spead in their use
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: James Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 14 November 2001 3:39 PM
> > > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > Subject: RE: Boost vs Cubic inches
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Correct me if I'm wrong but I belive that both Farrari and
> Toyota
> > > put
> > > > > out
> > > > > > > high tech qaud cam V8s.  And I could be wrong but I think a
lot
> of
> > > the
> > > > > F1
> > > > > > > cars use small V8s, 3.5L etc
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >i am well aware of this
> > > > > > > >but another thing to remember is that v8s use 1950s
technology.
> > > they
> > > > > > still
> > > > > > > >use push rods for fucks sake! if a manufacturer made a well
> > > balanced
> > > > > 3
> > > > > > > >liter v8, using quad cams and 4 or 5 valves per cylinder,
that
> > > would
> > > > > > change
> > > > > > > >the whole equation and put out the same if not more power.
> torque
> > > may
> > > > > be
> > > > > > > >down a bit, but nothing forced induction cant fix!!!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > >From: James Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > > > >Sent: Wednesday, 14 November 2001 2:52 PM
> > > > > > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > >Subject: Boost vs Cubic inches
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >Gentlemen,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >I enjoy seeing a L20B beat a V8 off the lights as much as
> anyone
> > > else
> > > > > but
> > > > > > > >you must remember we are talking a highly modified L20B vs a
> fairly
> > > > > stock
> > > > > > > >V8.  Its all about how much air and fuel you can get into an
> > > engine,
> > > > > and
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > >larger motor will always have the cability to intake more air
> and
> > > > > fuel. A
> > > > > > > >twin turbo RB26 can put out 1000hp but a equaly worked blown
V8
> > > will
> > > > > put
> > > > > > > >out
> > > > > > > >10,000hp.  There is a reason why the quickest cars in the
world
> run
> > > > > the
> > > > > > 1/4
> > > > > > > >with blown big block V8s.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >Although as you know your a lot more likey to be able to
afford
> to
> > > > > drive
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > >700 - 800hp turbo (both in building cost and in petrol) on
the
> road
> > > > > than
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > >10,000hp blown V8, blown V8s are BIG $$$ and use a LOT of
fuel,
> > > I've
> > > > > > heard
> > > > > > > >of such cars using over a litre of AVGAS per km!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >Don't want to burst anyone's bubble, but a larger engine,
> worked
> > > > > equally,
> > > > > > > >will aways produce more power.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >James Cox
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >OF COURSE THERE IS ITS CALLED BOOST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> > > > > > > > >That Harry guy is obviously a peanut.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >Duncan Shillito wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > "there is no substitute for cubic inches"
> > > > > > !!!!.................(harry
> > > > > > > > >firth 1967).
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> >_________________________________________________________________
> > > > > > > >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> > > > > > http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> _________________________________________________________________
> > > > > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> > > > > http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>

--membersozdat-------------------------------------------------------
OZDAT Mailing List   Please Note:-
Send (un)subscribe requests to  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send  submissions to  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No unauthorised redistribution of this email
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to