Great! Just found default item size is 64MB. -- smallfish http://chenxiaoyu.org
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Nadav Har Tzvi <freddy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Oh! That's great, also found a repo that has a package of 1.4.15 available > for Ubuntu 12.04 (Since the regular 12.04 repos don't have that version > yet) > If that is of any use: > http://www.ubuntuupdates.org/ppa/nathan-renniewaldock_ppa?dist=precise > > If you are around here Nathan, thanks :) > > I am going to try bombing it with data and see how it rolls. > Thanks Yiftach! Saved my day. > > On Monday, December 3, 2012 1:51:18 PM UTC+2, Yiftach wrote: > >> AFAIK, since version 1.4.14, the max size of a Memcached object is 500MB. >> >> See more details here: >> >> https://groups.google.com/**forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/** >> memcached/MOfjAseECrU<https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/memcached/MOfjAseECrU> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Nadav Har Tzvi <fred...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Hello there, >>> >>> Let me just start this topic by stating that I do know of the 1 MB item >>> size limitation in memcached and the reasons for why it is so. >>> >>> However I am faced here with a dilema. As part of a web service, I have >>> to return a bit large JSON object that includes base64 encoded images in it >>> (thus the large size). >>> The average JSON object size should be somewhere between 1.2 MB to 2MB >>> max. >>> In order to boost the whole deal, I decided to cache those items (Server >>> has more than enough memory) and grant access from Nginx to reduce the load >>> on the service and provide quicker responses. >>> >>> So my question is this, should I go for increasing memcached item size >>> or is there any other solution to bypass this problem? Searching google >>> didn't provide any good results, maybe you have any idea of how to deal >>> with this? >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Yiftach Shoolman >> +972-54-7634621 >> >>
