By "pinnacle of thought" I mean that one believes they have arrived at
the absolute truth.... (and no one can convince them otherwise).

Rick S

On Oct 27, 12:44 pm, ornamentalmind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> “I'm just trying to be diplomatic.” – Rick
>
> Yes Rick, I knew that. I was just using a lazy and simple method of
> adding my view to the mix.
>
> “One of the things I've noticed in all the groups I've joined is that
> some members seem very dogmatic.” – Rick
>
> Yes, and not only in groups. Differing levels of belief (dogma), many
> of which are based upon nothing are found within the human psyche…
> always have, always will be.
>
> “Everyone has a reason for believing what they believe, but to
> believe
> that one has somehow reached the very pinnacle of thought just by
> rejecting relgious thoughts or ideas and adopting scientific thought
> as the only valid form of reasoning seems to me to be very similar to
> the "fundamentalist" rigidity they decry.” – Rick
>
> I’m not sure that we all have reason(s) for our belief structures,
> many do, but I doubt all do. And, what is this ‘pinnacle of thought’
> you mention? Do you imply omniscience? If so, it is a strange
> juxtaposition with scientific thought, appropriate, but strange.
>
> “So, another question. Is it possible to be a "fundamentalist
> atheist"?” – Rick
>
> Fundamentalism is found for any and all types of thought, atheism
> included. This is directly implied by your earlier comments on dogma.
> And, often fanaticism is associated with this level of
> ‘understanding’.
>
> On Oct 27, 10:33 am, Rick S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I'm just trying to be diplomatic.  One of the things I've noticed in
> > all the groups I've joined is that some members seem very dogmatic.
> > Everyone has a reason for believing what they believe, but to believe
> > that one has somehow reached the very pinnacle of thought just by
> > rejecting relgious thoughts or ideas and adopting scientific thought
> > as the only valid form of reasoning seems to me to be very similar to
> > the "fundamentalist" rigidity they decry.  So, another question.  Is
> > it possible to be a "fundamentalist atheist"?
>
> > On Oct 27, 11:51 am, ornamentalmind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > "...to suggest that there is no possibilty that something might exist
> > > that could provide more insight into our lives other than just using
> > > our minds in their conscious state might be too dogmatic." - Rick
>
> > > I would remove the term 'might be' here and replace it with 'is'.
>
> > > On Oct 27, 9:31 am, Rick S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > I'm sure there are thousands or maybe millions of twins that would
> > > > disagree with your assessment.  No being a twin myself, I can never
> > > > know for sure.  As for going beyond logic, I saw a very interesting
> > > > video on TED  
> > > > http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/jill_bolte_taylor_s_powerful_strok...
> > > > where a brain scientist reveals what happenned to her during her
> > > > stroke.  She calls it a powerful stroke of insight.  My point is not
> > > > that we should not use logic and rationality.  Of course we should.
> > > > But to suggest that there is no possibilty that something might exist
> > > > that could provide more insight into our lives other than just using
> > > > our minds in their conscious state might be too dogmatic.
>
> > > > Rick S
>
> > > > On Oct 27, 10:58 am, Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > << And there's intuition, like when twins separated by some
> > > > > distance know the other is hurt. >>
>
> > > > > No, they don't.
>
> > > > > <<Anyone who has studied Quantum physics even a little will realize
> > > > > that there are things in the universe that seem to defy logic.  And >>
>
> > > > > You're misusing the term "logic" here.  Quantum physics may have
> > > > > propositions which contradict the propositions you use in everyday
> > > > > life, but the logic that manipulates those propositions remains the
> > > > > same.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Memphis Freethought Alliance" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to