You most likely would run into trouble using the word in neighborhoods
where I can freely. That is one of the wonderful aspects of the word.
You CANNOT fake it. It will strip a racist nekked! But if your heart
is true that, too, will be seen. That is the magick of the wonderful
word, my NIGGER.

http://niggerwise.com



On Nov 6, 8:52 am, CrossBow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Too much negativity and I will stand on that until I am buried.  YOU use the
> word however you please, but don't bludgeon me with it.  I could get killed
> for using that word and believe me, It is the dirtiest word in my book.
>
> I will never agree with you on this.  Think brick wall.  Does that make me
> narrow, no, it makes me decided:)
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:04 PM, BBDD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > That is a blatant racist attitude! Your shame as Southerners does not
> > own the name, nigger. It belongs to those who suffered from it, not to
> > those who should be ashamed for coining it. I have been a professional
> > artist for almost fifty years. That goes back to before computers. I
> > have lived, quite joyfully, in some of the most dangerous ghettos on
> > the West Coast. That studio space one needed before computers could be
> > had cheep. I use the word nigger and am proud to be called nigger.
> > Those who have overcome it are not offended by it in the least.  There
> > is no higher compliment one can pay to those very different from
> > yourselves, than this "niggerwise". It means to be real world wise
> > rather than to parrot the wisdom one reads. Perhaps that is what truly
> > bothers you.
>
> >http://niggerwise.com
>
> > On Nov 5, 3:46 pm, CrossBow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > BBDD, that word and using it in any manner is anathema to most people in
> > > this Memphis area who call themselves freethinker, and many who are not.
> > It
> > > carries too much, hurts too much, and should never be bandied about
> > > easily. Don't punish us for our revulsion of what we see as an insult, we
> > > reacted to percieved insult in using that name in a link.  Would that the
> > > word itself was buried with the last set of shackles!
>
> > > off to see the Wizard...
>
> >  > On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 3:38 PM, BBDD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Look, you are not free thinkers. In reacting the way you did, you were
> > > > Palinist. That is NOT A PERSONAL INSULT! A free thinker knows a word
> > > > like "nigger" is not offensive in itself. Friends call each other
> > > > "nigger". To point out that your reactions betray that you are not all
> > > > you imagine yourselves to be is reasonable. I question any here are
> > > > capable of REAL free thought. I make my living at it. I have some
> > > > bases for questioning your legitimacy based in your reactions to me.
> > > > My posts were in response to negativity expressed in TOPICS I STARTED
> > > > that had nothing to do with the topic or points made. Now, if you take
> > > > my response to defending myself as attack, that is just more evidence
> > > > of how much you lack in capacity for free thought. I not once
> > > > suggested anyone was mentally ill. I didn't pretend to diagnose to
> > > > discredit. That was you folks. I merely suggest that if you do such
> > > > things you have a whole lot of growing up to do. That is not attacking
> > > > you personally. It is attacking your behavior; bnehavior that
> > > > definitely constitutes "ranting and raving".
>
> > > >http://niggerwise.com
>
> > > > On Nov 5, 3:20 pm, "Liz Purkrabek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > I didn't insult you.  I asked about the link name you post.  Then
> > someone
> > > > > else expressed their dislike of the link name by writing that they
> > would
> > > > not
> > > > > click on the link.  Since that time, some of us have merrily
> > responded to
> > > > > your ranting and raving.  I suggest you go back and reread the
> > various
> > > > posts
> > > > > and do an insult count.  You will find that although some, like
> > myself,
> > > > had
> > > > > some fun at your expense (since your posts seem to be intentionally
> > > > inviting
> > > > > it) almost all of the insults and accusations that have been hurled
> > have
> > > > > been by you.
>
> > > > > But whatever.
>
> > > > > Liz (Who is busy not clicking your link.)
>
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: [email protected]
>
> > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> > BBDD
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 12:27 PM
> > > > > To: Memphis Freethought Alliance
> > > > > Subject: Re: democrats rule
>
> > > > > lsparklaria, I am sorry for insulting you. When I first arrived in
> > > > > this group I was roundly insulted. I challenged it to stop or I would
> > > > > return in kind. It did not stop. The mode of communication was set by
> > > > > others here who feel threatened by anything new. One need not suggest
> > > > > another is crazy or wrong in not seeing things as one does
> > themselves.
> > > > > Frankly, I find the approach asinine and will gladly abandon it with
> > > > > an apology from those who so welcomed me here so rudely. In the mean
> > > > > time, just don't take anything personally. Others set this junior
> > high
> > > > > school mode of exchange ~ not I.
>
> > > > >http://niggerwise.com
>
> > > > > On Nov 5, 12:14 pm, Isparklaria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > On Nov 5, 12:03 pm, BBDD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > You, like most here spew regardless of fact.
>
> > > > > > I don't claim to have any "facts." I am only working from my
> > > > > > observations and thinking. There are some intellectually honest
> > > > > > conservatives, in my opinion. Like most honest folks they rarely
> > find
> > > > > > success in politics.
>
> > > > > > I have a question for you, BBDD? Why do you attempt to insult me?
> > Is
> > > > > > it to draw attention to yourself?
>
> > > > > > On Nov 5, 12:03 pm, BBDD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > You, like most here spew regardless of fact. All here have
> > expressed
> > > > > > > nothing but the most hockey primitive notions of politics. There
> > is a
> > > > > > > camp within the Republican party that is very much like you. It
> > is
> > > > the
> > > > > > > idiots that think it is some kind of game one watches at the bar,
> > > > that
> > > > > > > has a winning side and a losing side. These are the Carl Roves
> > who
> > > > > > > think they merely need to more effectively hoodwink. You are no
> > > > better
> > > > > > > than Carl Rove. The world is evolving past your sport of politics
> > to
> > > > a
> > > > > > > realization that real problems are reaching proportions that
> > require
> > > > > > > we see things in a more mature, less sportsman like way. The
> > defining
> > > > > > > moment in all this political season is when those they call "the
> > > > > > > Christophers" suggested that all fiscal conservatives vote
> > straight
> > > > > > > Democrat to protest the direction the party has turned in
> > coddling
> > > > the
> > > > > > > redneck base. The Christophers are the real intellects... you
> > know...
> > > > > > > that thing you pretend to be.
>
> > > > > > >http://niggerwise.com
>
> > > > > > > On Nov 5, 7:45 am, Isparklaria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > On Nov 5, 6:28 am, BBDD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > That is a childish conclusion. Things are no longer about how
> > > > long
> > > > > any
> > > > > > > > > silly political party predominates.
>
> > > > > > > > Tell that to the necons and others who have taken over the
> > > > Republican
> > > > > > > > party. Above all else, it has been their goal to dominate.
>
> > > > > > > > >This election, more than
> > > > > > > > > anything else, thankfully will force conservatives to
> > redefine
> > > > > > > > > themselves.
>
> > > > > > > > It is more likely that any redefination done by the so called
> > > > > > > > conservatives will be *ALL* about fooling the gulible into
> > thinking
> > > > > > > > that they are out for them rather than becoming honest
> > > > conservatives
> > > > > > > > who deserve a place in the policy debate. You can't fool all of
> > the
> > > > > > > > people all of the time, but you can fool enough of the people
> > > > enough
> > > > > > > > of the time to get elected. If it wasn't for the timing of the
> > > > stock
> > > > > > > > market crash McCain may have won. This is not the old "straight
> > > > talk"
> > > > > > > > McCain either (who really wasn't all that straight talking. The
> > > > McCain
> > > > > > > > who ran against Obama is a sellout to the worst elements of his
> > > > party.
> > > > > > > > And Sarah Palin is likely to be their future.
>
> > > > > > > > I hope you are right BBDD, and the conservatives rethink their
> > > > game,
> > > > > > > > moving in the direction of honesty. This would likley make the
> > > > dems/
> > > > > > > > libs more honest too. I hope your're right, but I'm not betting
> > on
> > > > > > > > it!
>
> > > > > > > > On Nov 5, 6:28 am, BBDD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > That is a childish conclusion. Things are no longer about how
> > > > long
> > > > > any
> > > > > > > > > silly political party predominates. In a desperate world it
> > is
> > > > about
> > > > > > > > > what works beyond such considerations. This election, more
> > than
> > > > > > > > > anything else, thankfully will force conservatives to
> > redefine
> > > > > > > > > themselves. The situations created by Cheney/Bush rule and
> > will
> > > > for
> > > > > > > > > some time. NO ONE can just reverse what has been done world
> > wide.
> > > > > What
> > > > > > > > > remains to be seen is whether Obama, even with the balance
> > now in
> > > > > > > > > Congress, will be able to assist us in surviving what is
> > already
> > > > at
> > > > > > > > > play and defining the world. Even ending that ridiculous war
> > > > cannot
> > > > > > > > > suddenly make the damage done by it go away. Far more than
> > the
> > > > > support
> > > > > > > > > of both houses, what Obama has that will make a tremendous
> > > > > difference
> > > > > > > > > is the admiration of most of that world we screwed up. We are
> > not
> > > > a
> > > > > > > > > country anymore. No one is. Like it or not we are member
> > nations.
> > > > > Now
> > > > > > > > > maybe we can be a beneficial member of that family.
>
> > > > > > > > >http://niggerwise.com
>
> > > > > > > > > On Nov 5, 5:21 am, "Jason (Memphis)" <
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > democrats hold
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Memphis Freethought Alliance" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to