On Nov 5, 12:03 pm, BBDD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You, like most here spew regardless of fact.

I don't claim to have any "facts." I am only working from my
observations and thinking. There are some intellectually honest
conservatives, in my opinion. Like most honest folks they rarely find
success in politics.

I have a question for you, BBDD? Why do you attempt to insult me? Is
it to draw attention to yourself?

On Nov 5, 12:03 pm, BBDD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You, like most here spew regardless of fact. All here have expressed
> nothing but the most hockey primitive notions of politics. There is a
> camp within the Republican party that is very much like you. It is the
> idiots that think it is some kind of game one watches at the bar, that
> has a winning side and a losing side. These are the Carl Roves who
> think they merely need to more effectively hoodwink. You are no better
> than Carl Rove. The world is evolving past your sport of politics to a
> realization that real problems are reaching proportions that require
> we see things in a more mature, less sportsman like way. The defining
> moment in all this political season is when those they call "the
> Christophers" suggested that all fiscal conservatives vote straight
> Democrat to protest the direction the party has turned in coddling the
> redneck base. The Christophers are the real intellects... you know...
> that thing you pretend to be.
>
> http://niggerwise.com
>
> On Nov 5, 7:45 am, Isparklaria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Nov 5, 6:28 am, BBDD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > That is a childish conclusion. Things are no longer about how long any
> > > silly political party predominates.
>
> > Tell that to the necons and others who have taken over the Republican
> > party. Above all else, it has been their goal to dominate.
>
> > >This election, more than
> > > anything else, thankfully will force conservatives to redefine
> > > themselves.
>
> > It is more likely that any redefination done by the so called
> > conservatives will be *ALL* about fooling the gulible into thinking
> > that they are out for them rather than becoming honest conservatives
> > who deserve a place in the policy debate. You can't fool all of the
> > people all of the time, but you can fool enough of the people enough
> > of the time to get elected. If it wasn't for the timing of the stock
> > market crash McCain may have won. This is not the old "straight talk"
> > McCain either (who really wasn't all that straight talking. The McCain
> > who ran against Obama is a sellout to the worst elements of his party.
> > And Sarah Palin is likely to be their future.
>
> > I hope you are right BBDD, and the conservatives rethink their game,
> > moving in the direction of honesty. This would likley make the dems/
> > libs more honest too. I hope your're right, but I'm not betting on
> > it!
>
> > On Nov 5, 6:28 am, BBDD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > That is a childish conclusion. Things are no longer about how long any
> > > silly political party predominates. In a desperate world it is about
> > > what works beyond such considerations. This election, more than
> > > anything else, thankfully will force conservatives to redefine
> > > themselves. The situations created by Cheney/Bush rule and will for
> > > some time. NO ONE can just reverse what has been done world wide. What
> > > remains to be seen is whether Obama, even with the balance now in
> > > Congress, will be able to assist us in surviving what is already at
> > > play and defining the world. Even ending that ridiculous war cannot
> > > suddenly make the damage done by it go away. Far more than the support
> > > of both houses, what Obama has that will make a tremendous difference
> > > is the admiration of most of that world we screwed up. We are not a
> > > country anymore. No one is. Like it or not we are member nations. Now
> > > maybe we can be a beneficial member of that family.
>
> > >http://niggerwise.com
>
> > > On Nov 5, 5:21 am, "Jason (Memphis)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > democrats hold the presidency, the house and the senate...when clinton
> > > > and bush has this advantage, it didn't last their entire term.- Hide 
> > > > quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Memphis Freethought Alliance" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to