“…yet there may be some states that cannot be accessed by non-
entheogenic means and vice-versa…” – Preston

Preston, I’ll assume that you are talking in general…by that I mean
I’ll guess you are generalizing about all people and not some specific
person(s) you know. Given that, exactly what states do you believe can
only be accessed by entheogens? I will leave out all psychotic ones
for now. And, assuming that you will have some sort of a list, I’ll
further ask how you come to the conclusion(s) about entheogenic states
and their exclusivity.


On Nov 11, 7:13 pm, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quite true, yet there may be some states that cannot be accessed by
> non-entheogenic means and vice-versa.  Granted, the path without ingestion,
> contact or inhalation requires discipline and therefore probably has
> benefits without the bad consequences of exogenous chemicals.
>
> Preston
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "ornamentalmind" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Memphis Freethought Alliance"
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 6:54 PM
> Subject: Re: Romancing the Stoned
>
> "... Experimenting with altered states can be very enlightening; you
> just have to be sure of the situation you are in when you do.  ..." -
> Prestone
>
> While entheogens have been used 'forever', in no way are they a
> requirement for enlightened states.
>
> On Nov 11, 1:46 pm, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If it were legal, I think it would be fine recreationally. Triumph of
> > moderation is the key here. Experimenting with altered states can be very
> > enlightening; you just have to be sure of the situation you are in when
> > you do. The adage "Don't let the situation control you rather you control
> > the situation" applies here. Driving around in a car while on acid is a
> > bad choice; putting yourself in a safe environment with a designated sober
> > while tripping is a better choice. But most "experiencing" is illegal so
> > that makes it a bad choice in general.
>
> > BTW, chemically speaking, mary jane is a hallucinogen.
>
> > Prestone
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: CrossBow
> > To: [email protected]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 2:39 PM
> > Subject: Re: Romancing the Stoned
>
> > Hahaha! funny think!
>
> > I would agree about the gateway theory... but - I have turned down about
> > 100 bales of marijuana approx. in my short life, and was probably
> > enebriated most of that time. Living with musicians and artists will do
> > that. I never did coke, heroin, or anything else. My own curious cocktail
> > of brain chemicals have been adventure enough to keep me barely surviving.
> > I think all those love chemicals are dangerous, and cause more harm than
> > good for some. Imagine overload on the oxytocin! serotonin! whew! Makes it
> > easy to fall in love for some and not so good for others. Evolution is a
> > bitch:)
>
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 2:29 PM, ornamentalmind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
>
> > Oh, I believe in the gateway theory....and to that end, believe that
> > all milk should be outlawed! :-)
>
> > On Nov 11, 12:16 pm, CrossBow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Big Pharm does not seem to want much investigation into anything that
> > > isn't
> > > synthetically produced does it? Wasn't it the Rockefeller's and the
> > > Carnegie's that started pushing modern medicine/pills that buried the
> > > apothecary?
>
> > > My mother grew up on a road called "Hemp Patch", and no, that is not
> > > what is
> > > wrong with me:) I'm with you on decriminalization and I don't believe in
> > > the
> > > gateway theory either.
>
> > > seems like everyone I knew at one time had a pocket full of vicodin!
> > > made
> > > me TOO sleepy..
>
> > > here is a site for that opiate of the masses...luv:
>
> > >http://www.oxytocin.org/oxytoc/love-science.html
>
> > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 1:50 PM, ornamentalmind
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> > > > "…Think it will legalize?" – CB
>
> > > > It is quite difficult to tell. Not in the near future would be my
> > > > guess. It is a very complex situation. As a kid, I heard about the
> > > > green gel that could be purchased OTC that was mostly hash. Of course,
> > > > Coke used to have real coke in it. The snake oils of the past were
> > > > quite often even more addictive than much on the market today. The
> > > > current 'drugs' that are most addictive fall in the sweetener
> > > > categories. I'm leaving out the obvious things like cigs, alcohol and
> > > > the illegal drugs along with the 'legal' prescribed drugs.
>
> > > > I would guess that most of you have seen 'Reefer Madness'? Woody
> > > > Harrelson's movie 'Grass' is a great view of the history in the US.
> > > >http://worldfilm.about.com/library/00nowplaying/blgrass.htm
> > > >http://www.sphinxproductions.com/pages/film_grass.html
> > > >http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0214730/
>
> > > > He appears in a new movie about the topic too:
> > > >http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0417750/
>
> > > > Over the decades, along with a large group of people in the US, my
> > > > view is that at the very least this plant should be decriminalized. I
> > > > won't go into all of the great uses for hemp but will say that it used
> > > > to be a major part of the US economy and should still be. My dad owned
> > > > a house out on the tip of Big Pine Island where there used to be a
> > > > large hemp farm. Just the other day, I had some hempmilk. The clothing
> > > > would rival many other companies. Of course, the drug itself would fly
> > > > in the face of the FDA and AMA. Since apothecaries were banned in the
> > > > US, such things have been regulated by the powerful for money and
> > > > power reasons rather than the public good overall.
>
> > > > Even though the government remains a major obstacle, the general
> > > > public is beginning to come around. (read: old farts are dying out)
>
> > > > On Nov 11, 8:10 am, CrossBow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Marijuana was listed in the United States Pharmacopoeia from 1850
> > > > > until 1942 and was prescribed for various conditions including labor
> > > > > pains, nausea, and rheumatism.
>
> > > > >http://open.salon.com/content.php?cid=40921&source=newsletter
>
> > > > > Think it will legalize?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Memphis Freethought Alliance" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to