Yeah, and wonder if all black holes are "big bang" origins into another
universe? After all, they say the big bang began from a super dense point.
Wonder if the mass will balance out... Why couldnt that be the other side of
a black hole? Always wanted to ask that question but kept forgetting.

On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 3:35 PM, CrossBow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Well, sounds anal...from that description.
>
> just wondering if they left room for a multiverse...maybe it's all stuck
> between branes:)
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Clogtowner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi y'all - I suspect that the explanation will be that the universe
>> expands until it runs out of energy and then contracts into a black
>> hole until it reaches maximum density and then explodes starting the
>> cycle again (sounds good anyway.)
>>
>> On Dec 8, 2:44 pm, Isparklaria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I'm picking up a copy of Steinhardt and Turok's book from the library
>> > so I'll let you know what it says about black holes.
>> >
>> > On Dec 8, 10:27 am, CrossBow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > There must be an answer to black holes and where thier
>> captured/devoured
>> > > energy goes in this jumble somewhere...though I did not see it.  I
>> anyone
>> > > has that info...please send it my way:)
>> >
>> > > On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Isparklaria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > > Here is some information on the big collision hypothesis and a link
>> to
>> > > > the page. Google Paul Steinhardt and Neil Turok, the creators of
>> this
>> > > > idea for more information. Steinhardt and Turok also wrote a popular
>> > > > account in book form. I suggest that we read it next for the book
>> > > > club, since it gives a hypothetical answer as to what happened
>> before
>> > > > the big bang.
>> >
>> > > >http://www.actionbioscience.org/newfrontiers/steinhardt.html
>> >
>> > > > The cyclic universe model
>> >
>> > > > In this context, a new paradigm has been recently proposed by Paul
>> > > > Steinhardt (Princeton) and Neil Turok (Cambridge) —the cyclic
>> universe
>> > > > — that turns the conventional picture topsy-turvy.2 (Perhaps the
>> model
>> > > > should be called an old paradigm since it reinvigorates ancient
>> cosmic
>> > > > mythologies and philosophies, albeit using the tools of 21st century
>> > > > physics.) In this picture:
>> > > > ·       space and time exist forever
>> > > > ·       the big bang is not the beginning of time; rather, it is a
>> bridge
>> > > > to
>> > > > a pre-existing contracting era
>> > > > ·       the Universe undergoes an endless sequence of cycles in
>> which it
>> > > > contracts in a big crunch and re-emerges in an expanding big bang,
>> > > > with trillions of years of evolution in between
>> > > > ·       the temperature and density of the universe do not become
>> infinite
>> > > > at any point in the cycle; indeed, they never exceed a finite bound
>> > > > (about a trillion trillion degrees)
>> > > > ·       no inflation has taken place since the big bang; the current
>> > > > homogeneity and flatness were created by events that occurred before
>> > > > the most recent big bang
>> > > > ·       the seeds for galaxy formation were created by instabilities
>> > > > arising
>> > > > as the Universe was collapsing towards a big crunch, prior to our
>> big
>> > > > bang
>> > > > The new model provides insight into some questions unanswered by the
>> > > > Big Bang theory.
>> > > > The prospects for an alternative cosmology that is so different from
>> > > > the well-The prospects for an alternative cosmology that is so
>> > > > different from the well-established convention would seem extremely
>> > > > dim. Yet, the cyclic model recoups all of the successful predictions
>> > > > of the big bang/inflationary theory and has sufficient additional
>> > > > predictive power to address many questions which the big bang/
>> > > > inflationary model does not address at all:
>> > > > ·       What occurred at the initial singularity?
>> > > > ·       What is the ultimate fate of the Universe?
>> > > > ·       What is the role of dark energy and the recently observed
>> cosmic
>> > > > acceleration?
>> > > > ·       Does time, and the arrow of time, exist before the big bang?
>> or
>> > > > after the big crunch?
>> > > > In the new paradigm, each cycle proceeds through a period of
>> radiation
>> > > > and matter domination consistent with standard cosmology, producing
>> > > > the observed primordial abundance of elements, the cosmic microwave
>> > > > background, the expansion of galaxies, etc. For the next trillion
>> > > > years or more, the Universe undergoes a period of slow cosmic
>> > > > acceleration (as detected in recent observations1), which ultimately
>> > > > empties the Universe of all of the entropy and black holes produced
>> in
>> > > > the preceding cycle and triggers the events that lead to contraction
>> > > > and a big crunch. Note that dark energy is not simply added on — it
>> > > > plays an essential role. The transition from big crunch to big bang
>> > > > automatically replenishes the Universe by creating new matter and
>> > > > radiation. Gravity and the transition from big crunch to big bang
>> keep
>> > > > the cycles going forever. In fact, as will be discussed, the cyclic
>> > > > behavior is a strong attractor. That is, even if the Universe were
>> > > > disrupted from its periodic behavior, it would rapidly reconverge to
>> > > > the cyclic solution.
>> >
>> > > > In the new paradigm, each cycle proceeds through a period of
>> radiation
>> > > > and matter domination consistent with standard cosmology, producing
>> > > > the observed primordial abundance of elements, the cosmic microwave
>> > > > background, the expansion of galaxies, etc. For the next trillion
>> > > > years or more, the Universe undergoes a period of slow cosmic
>> > > > acceleration (as detected in recent observations1), which ultimately
>> > > > empties the Universe of all of the entropy and black holes produced
>> in
>> > > > the preceding cycle and triggers the events that lead to contraction
>> > > > and a big crunch. Note that dark energy is not simply added on — it
>> > > > plays an essential role. The transition from big crunch to big bang
>> > > > automatically replenishes the Universe by creating new matter and
>> > > > radiation. Gravity and the transition from big crunch to big bang
>> keep
>> > > > the cycles going forever. In fact, as will be discussed, the cyclic
>> > > > behavior is a strong attractor. That is, even if the Universe were
>> > > > disrupted from its periodic behavior, it would rapidly reconverge to
>> > > > the cyclic solution.
>> > > > Superstring theory and the cyclic universe
>> > > > The linchpin to the new paradigm is the transition from big crunch
>> to
>> > > > big bang. The transition was thought to be an impossible passage in
>> > > > which the laws of physics blow up. However, recent developments in
>> > > > superstring theory suggest that the cosmic singularity is otherwise,
>> > > > as the two authors have argued in a recent paper with Justin Khoury
>> > > > (Princeton), Burt Ovrut (Penn) and Nathan Seiberg (IAS).3
>> Superstring
>> > > > theory relies on the idea that the Universe contains nine or ten
>> > > > spatial dimensions, depending on the formulation, all but three of
>> > > > which are curled up in a compact manifold of microscopic size. In
>> this
>> > > > framework, the big bang and big crunch may be an illusion. Expressed
>> > > > in the usual variables of general relativity, it may appear that our
>> > > > usual space and time are disappearing. However, viewed with the
>> proper
>> > > > variables, our usual space dimensions actually remain infinite and
>> > > > time runs continuously. The transition from big crunch to big bang
>> is
>> > > > due, instead, to the collapse, bounce and re-expansion of one of the
>> > > > extra dimensions. For example, in a variant known as M theory:
>> > > > ·       the Universe consists of two branes (surfaces) bounding an
>> extra
>> > > > dimension, and the singularity corresponds to a collision and bounce
>> > > > of the two branes
>> > > > ·       the temperature and density of ordinary radiation and matter
>> remain
>> > > > finite at the bounce, and particles move continuously in a natural
>> and
>> > > > intuitive way
>> > > > New cosmological possibilities
>> > > > If superstring theory is proven to dispel the myth that the big bang
>> > > > is the beginning of time, then it opens up new possibilities for the
>> > > > cosmological history of the Universe. Six months ago, the "ekpyrotic
>> > > > model"4 was proposed by Khoury, Ovrut, Steinhardt and Turok as one
>> new
>> > > > possibility based on the idea of making a universe from a single
>> > > > collapse of the extra dimension. The cyclic model builds on lessons
>> > > > learned from the ekpyrotic example to produce a picture with
>> > > > remarkable predictive and explanatory power.
>> > > > (c) 2002, Paul J. Steinhardt, Ph.D. An update by the author of a
>> > > > previously published paper from his personal web page. See reprint
>> > > > policy.
>> > > > Paul J. Steinhardt, Ph.D., is a theoretical physicist in the
>> > > > departments of Physics and Astrophysical Sciences at Princeton
>> > > > University. His research spans problems in cosmology, astrophysics,
>> > > > particle physics and condensed matter physics. He is a leading
>> expert
>> > > > on inflationary cosmology and other events in the very early
>> universe.
>> > > > His work led to the first inflationary models for the universe, to
>> the
>> > > > discovery that inflation can seed galaxy formation, and to new
>> > > > observational tests. He also introduced the concept of quasicrystals
>> > > > and pioneered the study of their structural and elastic properties.
>> > > > Prior to his position at Princeton, Dr. Steinhardt served as the
>> Mary
>> > > > Amanda Word Professor of Physics at the University of Pennsylvania.
>> He
>> > > > is a member of the National Academy of Sciences, a Fellow of the
>> > > > American Physics Society, and a member of the American Astronomical
>> > > > Society.http://www.physics.princeton.edu/www/jh/research/
>> > > > steinhardt_paul.html
>> >
>> > > --
>> > > gnothe se auton- Hide quoted text -
>> >
>> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>  >
>> > - Show quoted text -
>> >>
>>
>
>
> --
> gnothe se auton
>



-- 
gnothe se auton

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Memphis Freethought Alliance" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/memphisfreethoughtalliance?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to