Laserdisc was still using analog for video; apparently one place it really shows is the part of 2001 where he goes into the monolith (at the end); DVD simply cannot replicate it.
-- John W Reames jwrea...@comcast.net Home: +14106646986 Mobile: +14437915905 On Dec 22, 2010, at 16:18, OK Don <okd...@gmail.com> wrote: > Laserdisc blew away VHS and Beta. I haven't seen it side-by-side with DVD, > but I expect that it will hold it's own. I'll verify next time I'm at my > brother's house - he still has both. > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Curt Raymond <curtlud...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> Think so? I was under the impression the generally accepted comparison was >> Laserdisc was about the same as VHS. DVD has twice the vertical lines of >> resolution. Digital compression throws a monkey wrench in to but I generally >> prefer DVD for quality. >> >> -Curt -- >> > OK Don > 2001 ML320 > 1992 300D 2.5T > 1990 300D 2.5T > 1997 Plymouth Grand Voyager > _______________________________________ > http://www.okiebenz.com > For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com > To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ > > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: > http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
