No, my use (usage?) of "comprised of" was incorrect, in the context of
Wilton's challenge. And you missed the other incorrectness. Your all
loosers.
--R
On 7/22/11 11:28 PM, Craig wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 21:36:44 -0500 Mountain Man<maontin....@gmail.com>
wrote:
--R wrote:
My post was comprised of as many as I could think of.
Comprise has some debate on its proper use, no?
Not that I know of.
You're use here is incorrect, no?
Actually, his use of comprise was correct. Your use of you're (a
contraction of you are, not the second person singular possesive, your),
however, was incorrect.
The grammar patrol is out and in force in okielist tonight.
AHA! :-)
Craig
_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
