No, this is not how our government is supposed to work. For the first hundred years, our government did not steal money for the purpose of redistribution.
You should read Davy Crockett's speech to Congress: http://www.fee.org/library/detail/not-your-to-give-2 -- Max Dillon Charleston SC '95 E300, '87 300TD, '73 Balboa 20 Jaime Kopchinski <jaime...@gmail.com> wrote: >But isn't this how government must work at a fundamental level? Take >taxes >from all, distribute it where its needed? > >- I don't have kids in school, which should my taxes go to pay for it? >If >you have kids, thats your problem to pay for it. >- Nobody is attacking me or my family, I shouldn't have to pay for a >war. >- I don't care if the interstate highway you take to work in your state >needs repair, I don't use it so I'm not paying for it. > >Seems pretty absurd, no? > >Closed minded extreem ideas don't go very far. (Except maybe with the >crowd on this list!) > >If you really feel your being stolen from, I kindly ask you do either >do >something about it, or leave and go try to find somewhere that suits >you. > Perhaps you can find a place with no taxes and where nobody will do >anything for you at all, seeing as you're all so self sufficient >Maybe >you can gather some ideas from these folks: >http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history-archaeology/For-40-Years-This-Russian-Family-Was-Cut-Off-From-Human-Contact-Unaware-of-World-War-II-188843001.html#ixzz2JKca7yGi > >Jaime > > >On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Max Dillon ><meadedil...@bellsouth.net>wrote: > >> Exactly. I view all entitlements and hand outs from federal >government as >> a Perversion of the law. Government is taking money by force from >one >> group of people and giving it to another. That is why we have >gridlock in >> WDC, the fight is about who gets to steal money from who now. >> >> -- >> Max Dillon >> Charleston SC >> '95 E300, '87 300TD, '73 Balboa 20 >> >> Dieselhead <126die...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>I'm surprised you seem to have so much hate and disgust for the >Jersey >> >>shore. You've been there? How about the rest of our state? What >> >makes >> >>you think we should not be supported by our government during a >time >> >of >> >>catastrophe like any other part of the country? >> >> >> >>Jaime >> > >> >Ah! There is el problemo.... "you think we should not be supported >> >by our government " Nothing against neu Joisey, or anywhere else, >> >but where in the United States constitution, does it say >> >"Congresscritters have the right to extort money from the populace >to >> >reimburse [rich] folks who build too close to water?" The real >> >question is how to bring the crongreescritters and the rest of >> >goobermint back within the enumerated powers of the constitution. >> > >> >I grew up near a very large body of water. When winds and floods >> >came, people generally washed out their house, threw out inexpensive >> >furniture, washed furniture made of real wood, bought some used >> >furniture and went back to work. Or else they moved out and left >the >> >remains to rot or be sold. People who wished some protection >bought >> >insecurance. Nobody even thought of asking for goobermint money. >> > >> >When lava flowed over Kalapana and destroyed most of the village and >> >most of Kalapana gardens, some people's insecurance paid, and some >> >insecurance companies took the weasel route, hanging their customers >> >out to dry. There was no goobermint money, not even from the >pipples >> >republik of hawaii. >> > >> >When Iniki wiped out Kauai, the largest insurer was owned by >Hawaiian >> >Electric, (helco) who as a utility has almost unlimited funds >> >available to borrow at low interest. Instead of sucking it up and >> >paying their insured, HELCO went to the pipples Republik of Hawaii >> >and begged them to rob the populace to honor the company's >> >obligations to their insured, because HELCO wanted to pay dividends >> >to its shareholders" That was such blatant irresponsibility it was >> >staggering at the time. >> > >> >Only when a region whose inhabitants overwhelmingly vote for the >> >Party, does the goobermint think of getting outside their >> >constitutional powers to seize funds from citizens (or print more, >> >thereby obligating future taxpayers to the debt) to play Santa to >the >> >Party constituency. Katrina is case in point. nawlins whined and >> >goobermint was forced to extort even more funds to hand out to the >> >Party constituency. Next door, Mizzippi got clobbered worse, but >> >most people went about the business of taking care of themselve, so >> >did not get the vast candy stores from the goobermint. Yes, >> >goobermint entities got goobermint handouts, but by and large the >> >citizenry got little compared on a per capita basis to nawlins. >> > >> >Reference: read The Law >> > >> >_______________________________________ >> >http://www.okiebenz.com >> >For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com >> >To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ >> > >> >To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: >> >http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com >> >> >> _______________________________________ >> http://www.okiebenz.com >> For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com >> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ >> >> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: >> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com >> _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
