hi Brian!

    i agree that a higher-mileage recommendation would be more useful, 
but BioD use hasn't been wide-spread enough for long enough yet that 
there's a lot of high-mileage experience to point to. even though we're 
well into the millions of miles of use in the local fleet here, we're 
still kinda' on the frontier here in the high-mileage regard as it 
relates to what we think of as high-mileage for our MBZs.
    as for the reason people seem to feel the need to mention that they 
haven't had any problems, i think it's in part because of all the 
misinformation that's out there about BioD use, as well as all of our 
natural suspicions. for example, you often hear about needing to change 
fuel hoses when using BioD, but i think that concern's seriously 
overblown; i'm still waiting to see any evidence of any need to do that 
on my 300D after several years of almost exclusively B99-B100 use.


cheers!
e


Zoltan Finks wrote:
> Thanks, Curt. That's the kind of info. that's helpful. You know, I
> actually haven't heard any tales, my hesitation is just something that
> came naturally to me I guess - sort of a common sense suspicion thing.
>
> But success stories of some 100k mi. are pretty good I suppose. Funny,
> I was just musing yesterday at how when people are selling a diesel
> these days, they throw in the required "biodiesel" word for marketing.
> But the thing that makes me chuckle is that they often say something
> like "been running bio for a year, and no problems!"
>
> Now, not that I'm against bio at all, but this sort of statement has
> two problems: 1. I would much prefer evidence that comes from maybe 10
> years or at least 100k. mi.; and 2. The fact that they even mention
> that there are no problems suggests to me that there is some reason to
> talk about problems.
>
> Brian
>
> On 11/28/07, Curt Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   
>> You replace the O rings on the center bolt (really the shaft down the center 
>> of the cover) not the bolt itself, total cost about $.80 IIRC.
>>
>> As to your concern about Mobil 1 I had a sarcastic comment all ready but 
>> then realized you'd dismiss it out of hand.
>> Instead I'll ask you this, how many other people do you have to hear from 
>> that have changed to synthetic oil on high mile engines with no major issues 
>> before you'll give up on the old wives tales (really old husband tales I 
>> guess) and give it a shot?
>>
>> Example #1 1996 Dodge Dakota ~120,000 miles at switch, leaking rear main 
>> seal was resulting in ~1qt loss in 500 miles. I changed the Mobil 1 10w30 
>> and within 30,000 miles the leak had slowed to about 1qt in 1500 miles, now 
>> its got ~210,000 miles and leaks like a qt in 2000 miles.
>>
>> Example #2 1983 MB 240D ~205,000 miles at switch, leaked ~1qt in 800 miles 
>> or so. Switched to Mobil 1, tried 0w40, 15w50, and 5w40 over ~ 60,000 miles. 
>> Leaked worse with 0w40, say about 1qt in 500 miles. A little better with 
>> (surprise) 5w40, ~1qt in 900-1000 miles. 15w50 was about the same as 
>> conventional oil. Never got any worse. Cold starts (at -20F say) were vastly 
>> improved. Sold with ~265,000, still on the road with a new owner...
>>
>> Example #3 1985 MB 190D ~230,000 miles at switch, leaked ~1qt in 1000 miles 
>> on the first fill with 15w50, now almost 2 years and ~50,000 miles later its 
>> down to about 1qt in 2000-2500 miles. I'm currently using 5w40 which if I 
>> can continue to get an adequate supply of I'll still use. This car I use 
>> LarryT's oil analysis on and change the oil at 10,000 miles (working toward 
>> higher) knowing its not "used up" and my engine is protected.
>>
>>
>> I just did a quickie spreadsheet, based on 25,000 miles a year at 10,000 
>> mile changes on Mobil 1 and 3,000 mile changes on conventional oil although 
>> each change with Mobil 1 is more than 2x the cost of conventional oil my 
>> overal cost (not including my time) is ~$50 LESS per year by using Mobil 1.
>> 3,000 is probably overly frequent for conventional oil, I ran the 
>> spreadsheet again with 5,000 miles and Mobil 1 loses by $10. Take Mobil 1 
>> out to 11,000 miles (which I don't think is impossible) and they're dead 
>> even. Fun with spreadsheets...
>>
>> -Curt
>>
>> Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:50:15 -0800
>> From: "Zoltan Finks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Re: [MBZ] Ticking noise - normal or trouble
>> To: "Mercedes Discussion List" <mercedes@okiebenz.com>
>> Message-ID:
>>  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>
>> Thanks. Hmm replace the cener bolt - wonder if that's an expensive
>>  part.
>>
>> Yeah, I came close to switching to Mobil 1 this time, but I am still
>> wondering if switching an old engine to synthetic could cause any
>> problems.
>>
>> Brian
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------
>> Get easy, one-click access to your favorites.  Make Yahoo! your homepage.
>> _______________________________________
>> http://www.okiebenz.com
>> For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
>> For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
>> http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
>>
>>     
>
> _______________________________________
> http://www.okiebenz.com
> For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
> For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
>
>
>   
_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

Reply via email to