you wrote<<its already hard for farmers in places like California to compete with population for water>>
That's what happens when you live in a desert and depend on mountain snowfall hundreds of miles away to provide everyone with water. It's not possible to *not* have some years when there is less snowfall - and some with more snowfall. Weather is cyclical - that's all that can be depended on. Also, all the GW predictions are based on computer models - some are wildly optimistic and others are wildly pessimistic with the pro-GW crowd choosing the most pessimistic models. These same models surprise us with a foot of snow when light rain is predicted - for the next morning! And we're supposed to believe what they predict in 5-90 years? Larry T (66 MGB, 74 911, 78 240D, 91 300D) www.youroil.net for Oil Analysis and Weber Parts Test Results http://members.rennlist.com/oil PORSCHE POSTERS! youroil.net Weber Carb Info http://members.rennlist.com/webercarbs . ----- Original Message ----- From: "Curt Raymond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Diesel List" <mercedes@okiebenz.com> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 9:36 PM Subject: Re: [MBZ] OT: The eco debate > > Don't we? Ocean levels will rise, theres really no debate there. Fresh > water stocks will become more precious, its already hard for farmers in > places like California to compete with population for water... > > Sure I don't know if it'll kill us off like fish in a pond that gets too > warm but I know it'll cause problems. > > As a side note I can't take credit for the idea (I ment to write an > attribution before) theres a video on Youtube (I think) where a guy puts > this forth, I just happen to agree. > > -Curt > > Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:06:42 -0600 > From: Donald Snook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [MBZ] OT: The eco debate > To: Mercedes Discussion List <mercedes@okiebenz.com> > Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Curt wrote: > > "So if we do nothing we die. If we change our evil ways we have a 50% > chance of dying. Your choice is certain death or a 50% chance of death." > > There is a flaw in your logic. The flaw is based on your assumption > that global warming is a) getting worse b) actually going to cause us > harm. > > Your argument is basically if we do something, we can reduce the risk > that it is going to kill us. BUT, you have completely left out another > possibility. Global warming (regardless of its cause) may not cause any > harm. What we do not know is whether the 1 degree increase in > temperature that we have experienced over the last 100 years is going to > have > any affect on us or the planet. > > Donald H. Snook > > > --------------------------------- > Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! > Search. > _______________________________________ > http://www.okiebenz.com > For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ > For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: > http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
