> On Dec 13, 2017, at 6:20 PM, Matt Harbison <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> On Dec 13, 2017, at 9:48 AM, Augie Fackler <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> I don't either. Do whichever of the versions that mentions hg that makes you 
>> happier?
>> 
>> (I think we should default to not advertising as git, so that people can 
>> file bugs? Or is that a bad UX?)
> 
> That’s what I initially thought, and how I coded it. I do think that’s 
> potentially a bad UX though. After seeing the example in the RFC, I wonder if 
> we should just put in both identifiers and be done with it.

Works for me.

(For optional bonus points, leave the config option so we can force a sane 
user-agent and at least eager hg devs can smoke out bad LFS servers? I don’t 
feel strongly though.)
_______________________________________________
Mercurial-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel

Reply via email to