Matt Harbison <mharbiso...@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 19:51:37 -0500, Sean Farley <s...@farley.io> wrote: > >> >> Augie Fackler <r...@durin42.com> writes: >> >>>> On Dec 13, 2017, at 6:20 PM, Matt Harbison <mharbiso...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On Dec 13, 2017, at 9:48 AM, Augie Fackler <r...@durin42.com >>>> <mailto:r...@durin42.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> I don't either. Do whichever of the versions that mentions hg that makes >>>>> you happier? >>>>> >>>>> (I think we should default to not advertising as git, so that people can >>>>> file bugs? Or is that a bad UX?) >>>> >>>> That’s what I initially thought, and how I coded it. I do think that’s >>>> potentially a bad UX though. After seeing the example in the RFC, I wonder >>>> if we should just put in both identifiers and be done with it. >>> >>> Works for me. >>> >>> (For optional bonus points, leave the config option so we can force a sane >>> user-agent and at least eager hg devs can smoke out bad LFS servers? I don’t >>> feel strongly though.) >> >> I can't speak for other LFS hosts but I can at least make sure the >> Bitbucket side works with either header. > > OK, good, thanks. > > Is there anything else that would be useful to coordinate with Bitbucket? (I > can't think of anything, other than I'd like to make the lfs.url sidecar > config > optional, and be able to send it to the push destination by default. That > seems to be how git works, IIUC.)
Off the top of my head, yeah, I can't think of anything else besides what you've already said. I probably won't be able to do much investigation until next week at the earliest, though. I'll try to keep up on the list and see how things go.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
