On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 19:51:37 -0500, Sean Farley <[email protected]> wrote:
Augie Fackler <[email protected]> writes:
On Dec 13, 2017, at 6:20 PM, Matt Harbison <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Dec 13, 2017, at 9:48 AM, Augie Fackler <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I don't either. Do whichever of the versions that mentions hg that
makes you happier?
(I think we should default to not advertising as git, so that people
can file bugs? Or is that a bad UX?)
That’s what I initially thought, and how I coded it. I do think that’s
potentially a bad UX though. After seeing the example in the RFC, I
wonder if we should just put in both identifiers and be done with it.
Works for me.
(For optional bonus points, leave the config option so we can force a
sane user-agent and at least eager hg devs can smoke out bad LFS
servers? I don’t feel strongly though.)
I can't speak for other LFS hosts but I can at least make sure the
Bitbucket side works with either header.
OK, good, thanks.
Is there anything else that would be useful to coordinate with Bitbucket?
(I can't think of anything, other than I'd like to make the lfs.url
sidecar config optional, and be able to send it to the push destination by
default. That seems to be how git works, IIUC.)
_______________________________________________
Mercurial-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
