Augie Fackler <r...@durin42.com> writes:

>> On Dec 13, 2017, at 6:20 PM, Matt Harbison <mharbiso...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On Dec 13, 2017, at 9:48 AM, Augie Fackler <r...@durin42.com 
>> <mailto:r...@durin42.com>> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> I don't either. Do whichever of the versions that mentions hg that makes 
>>> you happier?
>>> 
>>> (I think we should default to not advertising as git, so that people can 
>>> file bugs? Or is that a bad UX?)
>> 
>> That’s what I initially thought, and how I coded it. I do think that’s 
>> potentially a bad UX though. After seeing the example in the RFC, I wonder 
>> if we should just put in both identifiers and be done with it.
>
> Works for me.
>
> (For optional bonus points, leave the config option so we can force a sane 
> user-agent and at least eager hg devs can smoke out bad LFS servers? I don’t 
> feel strongly though.)

I can't speak for other LFS hosts but I can at least make sure the
Bitbucket side works with either header.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel

Reply via email to