Hey, no fair... you're not going to share the results of your investigation? :)
I guess we can all wait for verification... sigh... > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:mersenne-invalid- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dieter Schmitt > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:32 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Mersenne: prime > > Hi, > > at November 1, I saved a copy of Assignments Report. Today I downloaded > the > new Assignments Report and the Cleared Exponents Report. Stored the three > files into a database. > > Knowing the new prime exponent probably had been listed at Nov. 1 but > isn't > listed today ...... that's enough. > > Doing a query for inconsistency between the two Assignments Reports and > another query for inconsistency between the first query result and the > Cleared Exponents Report yields only a few possible entries > 3.500.000 > digits (<10). > > I didn't look for more than 10.000.000 digits ;-) > > Checking these few possibilities (IPS account ID) against hrf5.txt for > "Who" > @GIMPS and searching GIMPS HomePage (Top Producers/expanded version/"Who" > leaves only one entry matching the second condition (exponents tested = 3) > :-) > > Of course, the new prime exponent may have been assigned after Nov., 1 > ...... > > Yours, > > Dieter Schmitt > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ _ > Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.ndatech.com/mersenne/signup.htm > Mersenne Prime FAQ -- http://www.tasam.com/~lrwiman/FAQ-mers _________________________________________________________________________ Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.ndatech.com/mersenne/signup.htm Mersenne Prime FAQ -- http://www.tasam.com/~lrwiman/FAQ-mers
