Nathan Russell wrote: >> 12348829 103 F 9722991869324431663702571958950 22-Feb-01 07:48 >> SCUM C7375CE26 > > > Is this a bug in the reporting software? I don't have the tools to > work it out exactly, but a 103-bit number should be slightly larger > than 2^103, or > 10141204801825835211973625643008. > the factor > 9722991869324431663702571958950 > is one digit too short, and thus appears to be truncated.
2^103 is the upper limit I believe, not the lower limit. YotN, Henk _________________________________________________________________________ Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.ndatech.com/mersenne/signup.htm Mersenne Prime FAQ -- http://www.tasam.com/~lrwiman/FAQ-mers
