On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 08:30 -0800, Zack Rusin wrote: > On Tuesday 06 January 2009 18:28:56 keithw wrote: > > I'm open to ideas on improving the review process. I do read most > > patches as they are posted in the commit messages & send comments on > > occasion, but I'm sure there's scope for more. > > > > I'm not fond of a work flow where the reviewer is responsible for > > pulling the patch out of email and getting it into git. I don't know if > > it's a tool problem, but it seems to chew up unreasonable amounts of my > > time whenever I've tried to work that way. Maybe better tools would > > help, but I'm sceptical. > > > > Have you got a suggestion on how to integrate reviews better with the > > general Mesa process? > > I think since we're using Git we could actually try to get the most out of it. > > github.com is rather impressive when it comes to services created on top of > git. > > For example take a look at: http://github.com/blog/270-the-fork-queue they > have a nice videocast showing a feature used to integrate patches. It allows > you to also comment on commits in a similar way you'd do with reviewboard. I > find it all quite interesting.
Would that require hosting Mesa on github? I guess I'd better read the link... Keith ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It is the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Xq1LFB _______________________________________________ Mesa3d-dev mailing list Mesa3d-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev
