On 01/07/2009 05:36 PM, Keith Whitwell wrote: > On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 08:30 -0800, Zack Rusin wrote: >> On Tuesday 06 January 2009 18:28:56 keithw wrote: >>> I'm open to ideas on improving the review process. I do read most >>> patches as they are posted in the commit messages& send comments on >>> occasion, but I'm sure there's scope for more. >>> >>> I'm not fond of a work flow where the reviewer is responsible for >>> pulling the patch out of email and getting it into git. I don't know if >>> it's a tool problem, but it seems to chew up unreasonable amounts of my >>> time whenever I've tried to work that way. Maybe better tools would >>> help, but I'm sceptical. >>> >>> Have you got a suggestion on how to integrate reviews better with the >>> general Mesa process? >> I think since we're using Git we could actually try to get the most out of >> it. >> >> github.com is rather impressive when it comes to services created on top of >> git. >> >> For example take a look at: http://github.com/blog/270-the-fork-queue they >> have a nice videocast showing a feature used to integrate patches. It allows >> you to also comment on commits in a similar way you'd do with reviewboard. I >> find it all quite interesting. > > Would that require hosting Mesa on github? I guess I'd better read the > link...
Unfortunately yes. Your own repository and all the forks from which you want to merge changes to your own repo need to be hosted on github. tom ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It is the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Xq1LFB _______________________________________________ Mesa3d-dev mailing list Mesa3d-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev
