On Monday 11 January 2010 16:15:38 Jakob Bornecrantz wrote: > On 11 jan 2010, at 17.49, Zack Rusin wrote: > > I think the other stuff is acceptable. Take a look at the docs and > > let me know > > what you think. > > Hmm I don't think you should remove the CAPs but instead just say if > level X then CAPs Y,Z,W,Q are assumed to be present. This way the > hardware that fall between the cracks can expose one level plus the > extra CAPs it can do.
Would that be useful for anything? Or do you mean feature level + exceptions, oterhwise what's the point of feature levels if nothing supports them fully. > Another thing level 3 and below harder can not do ARB_npot but they > can do NV_texture_rect, the only hardware we have drivers that this > matter for is nv30 (I think) and r300. Yes, that's what the "unnormalized coords" part is about :) z ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Mesa3d-dev mailing list Mesa3d-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev
