When I tried to upload a blank letterhead to Google docs, it refused it
for being over 500k.  It has a picture of my family on it.  That was the
beginning and the end of Google docs for me.

On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 09:33 -0500, Jim Hartley wrote:
> OK, if you are going to define "Google Docs" as "Cloud" then maybe even 
> I have a use for it. The machines at work are moderately locked-down, 
> making it hard to get something I see there, or something I just happen 
> to think of (like a story idea) and want to get to my home computer, 
> across the boundary. But they have not locked out most of Google, Google 
> Docs is open, and I can use it as a set of files/folders common to both 
> machine. I never thought of it as "Cloud" but if it is, so be it.
> 
> Of course I don't use it for anything too sensitive. A "story idea," 
> usually a few sentences, isn't worth stealing ... a complete but 
> unpublished story would be, and I generally wouldn't put it there.
> 
> Jim Hartley
> 
> Sean O'Connor wrote:
> > As with anything it all depends on context.  In the context of 
> > developers/IT people and platforms, your description is a reasonable one 
> > for the term cloud computing.  In the consumer context, the term has a 
> > different meaning in it's most common use.  In that context, the term is 
> > used to refer to any service where the majority of the application's 
> > execution and storage happens on centralized servers which completely 
> > abstract any operational concerns from the user.  Examples would include 
> > gmail, dropbox, google docs, etherpad, github, and squarespace.
> > 
> > All of these services allow technically competent but not necessarily 
> > sophisticated users to setup, configure, scale, and use systems which 
> > previously they would have had to have hired an IT administrator to 
> > setup and manage.  They don't need to worry about dealing with outages, 
> > running out of resources, or keeping track of backups.  This is 
> > enormously powerful and valuable for a very large section of users.
> > 
> > Finally as a bit of a bonus, there are a number of collaboration type 
> > features which become much easier to implement when users are all 
> > working on a common system.
> > 
> > If the privacy concerns are too great of a risk for you and you are 
> > willing to spend the time and money to operate your own systems that's 
> > absolutely your business and your right.  Understand however that for 
> > many other people, the ability to fill out a form and not have email 
> > infrastructure be a problem for their company anymore is incredibly 
> > valuable.
> > 
> > A side note on the privacy concern/trust issue:  think about the 
> > incentives for Google or any other large "cloud computing" company. 
> >  They basically make more money in the logn term by increasing the 
> > number of people who use their services.  Anything they do to 
> > significantly violate a user's trust decreases the number of people who 
> > will use their service over the long term.  At the end of the day, they 
> > may do stupid things (e.g. expose your address book via buzz) but they 
> > have very strong incentives to correct those mistakes quickly and to 
> > learn from them.  When evaluating a service you need to look at more 
> > than just what /could/ they do and think about what makes sense for them 
> > to do. Look at the consequences for them if they do something "evil".
> > 
> > ____________________________
> > Sean O'Connor
> > http://seanoc.com
> > 
> > 
> > On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Chris Knadle <[email protected] 
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> > 
> >     On Monday 01 March 2010 21:54:51 Matthias Johnson wrote:
> >      > On Mar 1, 2010, at 9:14 PM, Mark Wallace
> >      >
> >      > <[email protected]
> >     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >      > > I see.  the problem is that I just experienced over 60 hours
> >     with no
> >      > > internet access.  Wouldn't that make it impossible to do much of
> >      > > anything with my computer?
> >      >
> >      > Ok so this is probably the biggest back and forth on lug I have seen
> >      > to date and it has morphed slightly off the original email but to me
> >      > this is the most damning thing about cloud computing.  If we were
> >     in an
> >      > always connected world it might work but we are not.  Also the fact
> >      > that open wifi is slowly becoming illegal these days the filtered
> >      > options for public wifi will probably be less than desirable.  Cloud
> >      > computing is definately something not needed IMO.  It also brings up
> >      > the issues of fair use and such.  Which laws apply?  Where the server
> >      > resides or the user?
> >      >
> >      > Matthias Johnson
> > 
> >     I'll throw this in, as it might answer some of your questions concerning
> >     "cloud computing" such as...   "Whaaat is it?!?" [Cat from Red Dwarf...]
> > 
> >     I recently went to an IEEE meeting about cloud computing (Nov 2009 I
> >     think?).
> >     As far as I could tell the term "cloud computing" mostly means "an
> >     automated
> >     method for a user to request and for a system to provision a virtual
> >     machine,
> >     with the specified resources".  In other words, you visit a web page
> >     to order
> >     a virtual box, you choose what kind of setup you want from a list of
> >     predefined configurations (one of which hopefully fits most of what
> >     you need),
> >     you click "go", and in a couple of minutes you've got a remote box
> >     available
> >     to you that you can ssh to, where you can modify the setup from there.
> > 
> >     Sounded like from there you can automate spawning virtual machines with
> >     duplicate configurations if you need to scale some network application.
> >     As far as I could tell, it's mostly geared towards businesses that
> >     can use
> >     that kind of automation in order to handle a network load that
> >     varies.  It's
> >     not an end-all be-all solution -- it's essentially a niche market.
> > 
> >     For an individual, there isn't much need for this kind of system
> >     unless that
> >     person is running a business like Craig's List, Paypal, etc --
> >     something that
> >     needs to be able to scale.  Whether "cloud computing" could host
> >     services like
> >     these more cheaply than doing it "in-house" isn't clear.  If it
> >     isn't, then
> >     "cloud computing" is essentially a solution in search of a problem.
> > 
> > 
> >      -- Chris
> > 
> >     --
> > 
> >     Chris Knadle
> >     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     Mid-Hudson Valley Linux Users Group                  http://mhvlug.org
> >     http://mhvlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mhvlug
> > 
> >     Upcoming Meetings (6pm - 8pm)                         MHVLS Auditorium
> >      Mar 3 - Sahana and 7 Years of MHVLUG Celebration
> >      Apr 7 - Nagios
> >      May 5 - Android
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mid-Hudson Valley Linux Users Group                  http://mhvlug.org
> > http://mhvlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mhvlug
> > 
> > Upcoming Meetings (6pm - 8pm)                         MHVLS Auditorium
> >   Mar 3 - Sahana and 7 Years of MHVLUG Celebration
> >   Apr 7 - Nagios
> >   May 5 - Android
> 


-- 
Robert Mark Wallace
60 Delaware Road
Newburgh, NY 12550-3802
Telephone: (845) 566-0586

Please note my new address and update your records

_______________________________________________
Mid-Hudson Valley Linux Users Group                  http://mhvlug.org
http://mhvlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mhvlug

Upcoming Meetings (6pm - 8pm)                         MHVLS Auditorium
  Mar 3 - Sahana and 7 Years of MHVLUG Celebration
  Apr 7 - Nagios
  May 5 - Android

Reply via email to