Martin McEvoy wrote:
Hello David...
David Janes wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Martin McEvoy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Martin McEvoy wrote:
I would also like to propose that an hEntry that is a comment
should be
marked up like this.....
<div class="comment hentry">
...
</div>
sorry I meant...
<div class="hentry comment">
...
</div>
I think those would be equivalent (?). However, another way to do it
would
be to add "comments" to a wrapping hfeed
<div class="hfeed comments">
<div class="hentry">a comment</div>
</div>
Im Sorry David I totally disagree with the above approach because It
detaches the comments from the original content, The Content and the
Comment should be presented inside the same feed element.
This is interestingly documented right here:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/2271787498/
Great stuff David, I dont like the in-reply-to extension because for
it to presented correctly in hAtom terms you would have to "emulate"
another namespace, ie the entry- bit.
Anyway If you are proposing adding stuff to hatom like
in-reply-to(replies) etc... why not use an official atom term like
"related"[1]
<a rel="related" href="#comment-001">link to this</a>
[1] http://www.atomenabled.org/developers/syndication/index.php#link
Even better use an existing link type "section"[1] to indicate that the
href attribute of a link is a section of the current page.
<a rel="section" href="#comment-001">link to this</a>
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/types.html#h-6.12
Thanks.
--
Martin McEvoy
http://weborganics.co.uk/
_______________________________________________
microformats-new mailing list
microformats-new@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
