David Janes wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Martin McEvoy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David Janes wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Sarven Capadisli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
As Tantek suggested, it would be better to keep our focus on the
instance of a comment. If I'm understanding this correctly, it means:
what makes this a comment in and of it self?
I think that's framing the discussion to achieve a particular answer.
Where does this lonely comment exist in the real world?
I suggest that the best approach this exactly the same hAtom:
- look at the real world examples
- find a minimal solution that covers at least 80% of the examples and
doesn't require presentation impact
- see if that solution can be expanded afterward to cover edge cases &
other interesting things (nesting, for example)
Regards, etc...
I think there is a different discussion concerning "comments" [1] maybe your
thoughts need to go there?
[http://microformats.org/wiki/comments-formats]
Thanks
This is not a discussion of formats, it's a discussion of what people
do. How can you discuss creating a microformat if you're not
discussing what people are doing?
I cant answer that David, the discussion needs to be consolidated and
re-thought (the same as this discussion was)
Thanks
--
Martin McEvoy
http://weborganics.co.uk/
_______________________________________________
microformats-new mailing list
microformats-new@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new