On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Martin McEvoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Janes wrote: >> >> On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Sarven Capadisli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> As Tantek suggested, it would be better to keep our focus on the >>> instance of a comment. If I'm understanding this correctly, it means: >>> what makes this a comment in and of it self? >>> >>> >> >> I think that's framing the discussion to achieve a particular answer. >> Where does this lonely comment exist in the real world? >> >> I suggest that the best approach this exactly the same hAtom: >> - look at the real world examples >> - find a minimal solution that covers at least 80% of the examples and >> doesn't require presentation impact >> - see if that solution can be expanded afterward to cover edge cases & >> other interesting things (nesting, for example) >> >> Regards, etc... >> >> > > I think there is a different discussion concerning "comments" [1] maybe your > thoughts need to go there? > > [http://microformats.org/wiki/comments-formats] > > Thanks
This is not a discussion of formats, it's a discussion of what people do. How can you discuss creating a microformat if you're not discussing what people are doing? -- David Janes Mercenary Programmer http://code.davidjanes.com _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list microformats-new@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new