On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Martin McEvoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I already did that, what do you think, that I came out with a proposal from > "thin air", Maybe YOU should try doing the same before you assert your > proposals, But first understand the questions Where is: - examples how comments currently "in-the-wild" indicate their parentage? - examples of the impact proposed changes modify existing markup? Here's the "comment problem" [1] as stated on the Wiki: | Shortform: How do you track blog comments you've made? | | Longform: How do track the comments you have made on blogs, comments made on blogs your interested in and comments other people have made on your own blog? | | How can you do this in a way that can be programically represented, ingested into some kind of datastore, searched or aggregated? In case you're missing where the "feed" is, here's the definition of feed [2] - it's a bucket for containing entries, further discussed here [3]. Given that _every single example_ has that bucket, I'm not sure why you think it's critical to ignore it, even given the problem statement. [1] http://microformats.org/wiki/comment-problem [2] http://www.atomenabled.org/developers/syndication/atom-format-spec.php#rfc.section.4.1.1 [3] http://www.atomenabled.org/developers/syndication/#requiredFeedElements -- David Janes Mercenary Programmer http://code.davidjanes.com _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list microformats-new@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new