Point taken. We are working on it. Back to MT issues.
-----Original Message----- From: mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com [mailto:mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com] On Behalf Of Chris Gotstein Sent: April-21-10 11:16 AM To: Mikrotik discussions Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] [Spam Bayesian - ] - Re: Mikrotik/StarOS 10mhz/5mhz channel compatibility - Bayesian Filter detected spam Running MT APs with XR2 cards. No problems connecting Tranzeo CPQ/SL2 or UBNT radios when using a 10mhz channel. I do agree on how well we like our Tranzeo radios. I just wish they could come down on the price of the CPQ-19f radio. We can get a bullet2HP w/ 19db panel for a lot less. The price on the CPQ-15f/SL2-15f is perfect and competitive with a Bullet2 w/ 16db panel. ---- ---- ---- ---- Chris Gotstein, Sr Network Engineer, UP Logon/Computer Connection UP http://uplogon.com | +1 906 774 4847 | ch...@uplogon.com On 4/21/2010 12:39 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > Does Tranzeo work with Ubnt or MT or StarOS in 5 or 10 mhz channels? > > I guess 2.4 and 5ghz are different compatibility wise as it's come to light > that StarOS and MT work together in 5ghz but not 2.4. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > "Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue > that counts." > --- Winston Churchill > > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Robert Andrews <rob...@avantwireless.com>wrote: > > Damian, > Thank you for making this public. We know that MT and Valemount > have > no love lost, and thanks to both Tranzeo and UBNT for working with both > of them. Your competitive spirit made this business thrive against > proprietary interests... We wish that StarOS and MT would have > cooperated in this to make it so we didn't have to choose one or the > other. We would have both in our network for each of their particular > advantages if they had.... Our testing showed ST did better on > customer throughput and MT did better as real routers... > > Tranzeo and UBNT did best as customer equipment with Tranzeo doing > better in marginal conditions and UBNT doing better in price... So we > have both. > > Best, > Robert > > On 04/21/2010 10:22 AM, Damian Wallace wrote: >>>> Insert Flame here ^^^^^^^ >>>> >>>> State Secret. >>>> >>>> The beacons from one are in a different format than the other. It has to >>>> fixed in the code by one or the other, preferably both. An SA, unless >>>> it's a high end lab grade one, won't show the difference. Since 5 >>>> MHz was a lucky accident on Atheros' part, they never documented how to >>>> use it fully so different vendors made reasonable, but different, >>>> choices about how to modify their drivers to use it. Result is staring >>>> Matt in the face with an evil grin. It can be fixed, in code though. >>>> After all, Tranzeo and other brands can connect to both. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Damian >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com >>>> [mailto:mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com] On Behalf Of D. Ryan Spott >>>> Sent: April-21-10 10:09 AM >>>> To: Mikrotik discussions >>>> Cc: Mikrotik discussions >>>> Subject: [Spam Bayesian - ] - Re: [Mikrotik] Mikrotik/StarOS 10mhz/5mhz >>>> channel compatibility - Bayesian Filter detected spam >>>> >>>> What are the center frequencies reported by the staros and mtik boxes >>>> when you go to 10mhz channels? >>>> >>>> Do you have a spectrum analyzer? >>>> >>>> ryan >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Apr 21, 2010, at 10:04 AM, Matt Larsen - Lists >>>> <li...@manageisp.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Did some more testing on this today. >>>>> >>>>> 5ghz 10mhz and 5mhz channels seem to work fine, with Mikrotik as a >>>>> client to a StarOS AP. >>>>> >>>>> 2.4ghz 10mhz and 5mhz channels do not work at all with Mikrotik as a >>>>> client to a StarOS AP. I did verify that the 20mhz channel >>>>> settings worked fine. >>>>> >>>>> This was using Mikrotik R52 cards on both sides, Hardware Retries >>>>> set to 15 and tested under Mikrotik 2.9.48 and 3.25. StarOS is >>>>> version 1.3.23b. >>>>> >>>>> Ideas? >>>>> >>>>> Matt Larsen >>>>> vistabeam.com >>>>> >>>>> On 4/13/2010 7:18 AM, Chuck Hogg wrote: >>>>>> What specifically is the problem? They won't connect on 5/10MHz on a >>>>>> StarOS AP? Is the StarOS AP an Atheros based AP? Have you tried >>>>>> setting Hardware Retries to 15 under advanced wireless settings on >>>>>> the >>>>>> Tik? >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Chuck Hogg >>>>>> Shelby Broadband >>>>>> 502-722-9292 >>>>>> ch...@shelbybb.com >>>>>> http://www.shelbybb.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com >>>>>> [mailto:mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com] On Behalf Of Matt >>>>>> Larsen - >>>>>> Lists >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 9:13 AM >>>>>> To: Mikrotik discussions >>>>>> Subject: [Mikrotik] Mikrotik/StarOS 10mhz/5mhz channel compatibility >>>>>> >>>>>> I realize that I asked this question a few months ago, but thought >>>>>> that >>>>>> I would ask again to see if anyone knows whether there have been >>>>>> changes >>>>>> in new versions of Mikrotik that would fix the compatibility with >>>>>> StarOS >>>>>> >>>>>> 10mhz/5mhz APs? I have a pile of MT units that are no good to me >>>>>> unless they work with StarOS APs. >>>>>> >>>>>> Matt Larsen >>>>>> vistabeam.com >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Mikrotik mailing list >>>>>> Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com >>>>>> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik >>>>>> >>>>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik >>>>>> RouterOS >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Mikrotik mailing list >>>>>> Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com >>>>>> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik >>>>>> >>>>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik >>>>>> RouterOS >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Mikrotik mailing list >>>>> Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com >>>>> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik >>>>> >>>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik >>>>> RouterOS >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Mikrotik mailing list >>>> Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com >>>> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik >>>> >>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik >>>> RouterOS >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Mikrotik mailing list >>>> Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com >>>> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik >>>> >>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik > RouterOS >>>> _______________________________________________ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik >> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS >> > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: <http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20100421/f41b2 af2/attachment.html> > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik mailing list > Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com > http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS _______________________________________________ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS _______________________________________________ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
