-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 That's great, we too would like to use more Tranzeo...
On 04/21/2010 11:42 AM, Damian Wallace wrote: > Point taken. We are working on it. > > Back to MT issues. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com > [mailto:mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com] On Behalf Of Chris > Gotstein > Sent: April-21-10 11:16 AM > To: Mikrotik discussions > Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] [Spam Bayesian - ] - Re: Mikrotik/StarOS > 10mhz/5mhz channel compatibility - Bayesian Filter detected spam > > Running MT APs with XR2 cards. No problems connecting Tranzeo CPQ/SL2 > or UBNT radios when using a 10mhz channel. > > I do agree on how well we like our Tranzeo radios. I just wish they > could come down on the price of the CPQ-19f radio. We can get a > bullet2HP w/ 19db panel for a lot less. The price on the > CPQ-15f/SL2-15f is perfect and competitive with a Bullet2 w/ 16db panel. > > ---- ---- ---- ---- > Chris Gotstein, Sr Network Engineer, UP Logon/Computer Connection UP > http://uplogon.com | +1 906 774 4847 | ch...@uplogon.com > > On 4/21/2010 12:39 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >> Does Tranzeo work with Ubnt or MT or StarOS in 5 or 10 mhz channels? >> >> I guess 2.4 and 5ghz are different compatibility wise as it's come to > light >> that StarOS and MT work together in 5ghz but not 2.4. >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> "Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to > continue >> that counts." >> --- Winston Churchill >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Robert Andrews > <rob...@avantwireless.com>wrote: >> >> Damian, >> Thank you for making this public. We know that MT and > Valemount >> have >> no love lost, and thanks to both Tranzeo and UBNT for working with > both >> of them. Your competitive spirit made this business thrive against >> proprietary interests... We wish that StarOS and MT would have >> cooperated in this to make it so we didn't have to choose one or the >> other. We would have both in our network for each of their particular >> advantages if they had.... Our testing showed ST did better on >> customer throughput and MT did better as real routers... >> >> Tranzeo and UBNT did best as customer equipment with Tranzeo doing >> better in marginal conditions and UBNT doing better in price... So > we >> have both. >> >> Best, >> Robert >> >> On 04/21/2010 10:22 AM, Damian Wallace wrote: >>>>> Insert Flame here ^^^^^^^ >>>>> >>>>> State Secret. >>>>> >>>>> The beacons from one are in a different format than the other. It > has to >>>>> fixed in the code by one or the other, preferably both. An SA, > unless >>>>> it's a high end lab grade one, won't show the difference. > Since 5 >>>>> MHz was a lucky accident on Atheros' part, they never documented > how to >>>>> use it fully so different vendors made reasonable, but different, >>>>> choices about how to modify their drivers to use it. Result is > staring >>>>> Matt in the face with an evil grin. It can be fixed, in code > though. >>>>> After all, Tranzeo and other brands can connect to both. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Damian >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com >>>>> [mailto:mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com] On Behalf Of D. Ryan > Spott >>>>> Sent: April-21-10 10:09 AM >>>>> To: Mikrotik discussions >>>>> Cc: Mikrotik discussions >>>>> Subject: [Spam Bayesian - ] - Re: [Mikrotik] Mikrotik/StarOS > 10mhz/5mhz >>>>> channel compatibility - Bayesian Filter detected spam >>>>> >>>>> What are the center frequencies reported by the staros and mtik > boxes >>>>> when you go to 10mhz channels? >>>>> >>>>> Do you have a spectrum analyzer? >>>>> >>>>> ryan >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Apr 21, 2010, at 10:04 AM, Matt Larsen - Lists >>>>> <li...@manageisp.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Did some more testing on this today. >>>>>> >>>>>> 5ghz 10mhz and 5mhz channels seem to work fine, with Mikrotik as a >>>>>> client to a StarOS AP. >>>>>> >>>>>> 2.4ghz 10mhz and 5mhz channels do not work at all with Mikrotik as > a >>>>>> client to a StarOS AP. I did verify that the 20mhz channel >>>>>> settings worked fine. >>>>>> >>>>>> This was using Mikrotik R52 cards on both sides, Hardware Retries >>>>>> set to 15 and tested under Mikrotik 2.9.48 and 3.25. StarOS is >>>>>> version 1.3.23b. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ideas? >>>>>> >>>>>> Matt Larsen >>>>>> vistabeam.com >>>>>> >>>>>> On 4/13/2010 7:18 AM, Chuck Hogg wrote: >>>>>>> What specifically is the problem? They won't connect on 5/10MHz > on a >>>>>>> StarOS AP? Is the StarOS AP an Atheros based AP? Have you tried >>>>>>> setting Hardware Retries to 15 under advanced wireless settings > on >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> Tik? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Chuck Hogg >>>>>>> Shelby Broadband >>>>>>> 502-722-9292 >>>>>>> ch...@shelbybb.com >>>>>>> http://www.shelbybb.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>> From: mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com >>>>>>> [mailto:mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com] On Behalf Of Matt >>>>>>> Larsen - >>>>>>> Lists >>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 9:13 AM >>>>>>> To: Mikrotik discussions >>>>>>> Subject: [Mikrotik] Mikrotik/StarOS 10mhz/5mhz channel > compatibility >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I realize that I asked this question a few months ago, but > thought >>>>>>> that >>>>>>> I would ask again to see if anyone knows whether there have been >>>>>>> changes >>>>>>> in new versions of Mikrotik that would fix the compatibility with >>>>>>> StarOS >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 10mhz/5mhz APs? I have a pile of MT units that are no good to > me >>>>>>> unless they work with StarOS APs. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Matt Larsen >>>>>>> vistabeam.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Mikrotik mailing list >>>>>>> Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com >>>>>>> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to > Mikrotik >>>>>>> RouterOS >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Mikrotik mailing list >>>>>>> Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com >>>>>>> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to > Mikrotik >>>>>>> RouterOS >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Mikrotik mailing list >>>>>> Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com >>>>>> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik >>>>>> >>>>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to > Mikrotik >>>>>> RouterOS >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Mikrotik mailing list >>>>> Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com >>>>> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik >>>>> >>>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik >>>>> RouterOS >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Mikrotik mailing list >>>>> Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com >>>>> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik >>>>> >>>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik >> RouterOS >>>>> > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik mailing list > Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com > http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik >>> > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik > RouterOS >>> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: > <http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20100421/f41b2 > af2/attachment.html> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mikrotik mailing list >> Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com >> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik > >> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik > RouterOS > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik mailing list > Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com > http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik > > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik > RouterOS > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik mailing list > Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com > http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik > > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLz1pGAAoJEC+8HUjSuDOsGR0H/R37ZguKp8ad6aryvjb+QJKV +noILTx6ZexBQTUVZcv0bnJr8LxHJ5R+UBGh7sI8Ac+5uAU8Dx82TxzKAFX7v/jz PwQXwC+/IpRozNTL8Pf1tw/wholTNrniUi6QJ2QxmHMLDWOzimO7qbuK5xM4KReN 1rsxcaMyZyrRbf1nEKrsiqu7wMSSkvOF24hvnymD6jKJZQhClyg2xdIDsXwmcoBp tiWeUxLoQw8paBBr9Qy+BNzO/nEORKWynCs5GuSCVPnuc/QXWyVqmk7X/wWphAan VLyyBPfgdaom8qkX0I/U+LVTObg2oFdRczCY5Bx1LMkpoyQNzsjBhWbWdE6B2JU= =0p4Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
