I've never seen any precedent of anyone ever doing this anywhere.

Are you saying we are all in violation here? If so, 'we' includes a
huge amount of developers and applications (every Windows C++
application built with GCC!)

On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Corinna Vinschen <vinsc...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Oct 26 15:04, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
>> And that Section 6 clearly states you can point to e.g. the GCC website for
>> the source code:
>> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#SourceAndBinaryOnDifferentSites
>
> No, you're misinterpreting that.  Read again.  *You* can provide the
> sources of the GPLed stuff you're providing in binary form on another
> site.  That does not imply that you can burden *somebody else*, aka the
> GCC website, with the resposibility to provide the source code for you.
>
>
> Corinna
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
> _______________________________________________
> Mingw-w64-public mailing list
> Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to