I've never seen any precedent of anyone ever doing this anywhere. Are you saying we are all in violation here? If so, 'we' includes a huge amount of developers and applications (every Windows C++ application built with GCC!)
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Corinna Vinschen <vinsc...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Oct 26 15:04, Ruben Van Boxem wrote: >> And that Section 6 clearly states you can point to e.g. the GCC website for >> the source code: >> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#SourceAndBinaryOnDifferentSites > > No, you're misinterpreting that. Read again. *You* can provide the > sources of the GPLed stuff you're providing in binary form on another > site. That does not imply that you can burden *somebody else*, aka the > GCC website, with the resposibility to provide the source code for you. > > > Corinna > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct > _______________________________________________ > Mingw-w64-public mailing list > Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
