On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 5:06 AM, Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote:
> Oh man, you are drastically reducing the average intelligence of any > group you join. > > But I liked this admission on your blog: > > "Just for the record, I make no illusions about being a complete jerk. Nor > have I ever tried to be nice to a stranger once in my life, unless it was > a homeless person whom could buy me alcohol or cigarettes as a teenager. > I am a callous, rude, and unforgiving person. To the accusations against > me I will plead: guilty as charged. I am an arsehole." > > Source: http://old.johntate.org/node/316?page=1 > > Considering that you proudly admit to being an asshole, with zero > consideration for your fellow man, don't you think that you are sometimes > expecting too much from others? You asshole! > > John Tate <j...@johntate.org> wrote: > > > Where did I state I think I am a genius? I want an actual quote, nothing > > less. > > > > Your grammar indicates rage rather than humor. > > > > My actual expertise is philosophy and psychology, you have narcissistic > > personality disorder. That is what the world calls it. In Objectivism, we > > call it misplaced self-esteem. > > [snip] > > You are projecting, you really are the one with the most obvious disorders > on this list. > > And although I can't bring myself to read through the diarrhea on your > site, it seems that the majority of your "philosophy" posts are about > bashing an Objectivist Ph.D in philosophy. Your level is ...? And yet you > pretend to speak for Objectivists. > > Please don't think this guy understands Objectivism better than he > understands OpenBSD, C++, psychology, or anything. > Why is it so important that you must plead the list for this? You are a people-obsessed loser. -- www.johntate.org
