Thank you for this hint.
I indeed have ike.c r=1.76.

I will refresh my system  tonight, give it a try and report my result.

Best Regards
Christoph


> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Otto Moerbeek [mailto:o...@drijf.net]
> Gesendet: Montag, 24. September 2012 22:03
> An: Christoph Leser
> Cc: Stuart Henderson; misc@openbsd.org
> Betreff: Re: Router project on OpenBSD questions
>
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 06:57:26PM +0000, Christoph Leser wrote:
>
> > Thanks for clarification.
> >
> > I disabled NAT-T with isakmpd -K -T.
> >
> > A few of my VPNs came to life with this setting, but were instable (
rapid
> renegotiation ).
> >
> > Still only about one third of my vpns (that worked with OpenBSD 4.6 )
work
> with OpenBSD 5.2.
> >
> > Many negotiations get rejected by OpenBSD with 'NO PROPOSAL CHOSEN',
> or 'PAYLOAD MALFORMED' or 'INVALID ID'
> >
> > For some of those I see messages in /var/log/messages like :
> >
> > Sep 24 20:00:09 q-dsl isakmpd[3828]: attribute_unacceptable: attr
> > ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM does not exist in
> > phase1-transform-peer-a.b.c.d-PRE_SHARED-MD5-AES128
> >
> > ( for a VPN peer  which is configured with MD5-AES-128 in ipsec.conf and
> which, according to tcpdump, tries to negotiate exactly MD5 and AES-128  ).
> >
> > No idea what this means.
>
> Are you running an ipsecctl from about a week ago?
>
> For two days or so there was a bug in it. This bug was fixed by this
commit:
> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-
> bin/cvsweb/src/sbin/ipsecctl/ike.c.diff?r1=1.76;r2=1.77;only_with_tag=MAI
> N
>
>       -Otto
>
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > > -----Urspr??ngliche Nachricht-----
> > > Von: Stuart Henderson [mailto:s...@spacehopper.org]
> > > Gesendet: Montag, 24. September 2012 16:41
> > > An: Christoph Leser
> > > Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> > > Betreff: Re: Router project on OpenBSD questions
> > >
> > > On 2012/09/24 13:24, Christoph Leser wrote:
> > > > It seems that the patch from Stuart Henderson, proposed on Aug.4
> > > > 2012 on tech@  has not made it into ???current yet.
> > >
> > > I only forwarded it, the patch is from hshoexer. Also it is only a
> > > partial diff, not suitable to be committed, the encap mode value
> > > needs to be controllable per-peer so it needs a config option, changes
to
> ipsecctl, etc.
> > >
> > > This problem certainly would have affected older OpenBSD versions
> > > though, if they negotiated NAT-T they would have used the value from
> > > the RFC not the one from the internet-draft that cisco use.
> > >
> > > Have you tried just disabling nat-t completely, see the options list
> > > in isakmpd(8), to see what happens?

Reply via email to