>Through the history of openbsd there have been architectures in which more >bugs have been found and some in which fewer bugs have appeared.
That is not true. >Then maybe the number of bugs for an architecture can be matched to the >power-on-time for the machines for that architecture. Maybe. Probably need them on to prove or disprove the point. >For example, if 1% of the total number of bugs in the history of openbsd have >appeared on architecture x, then it's likely that it will continue to be so, >then all the machines for that architecture should be powered on just 1% of >the time. Another great advantage here is that all the pesky developers who love those machines will go away, and we'll only need to run on the best architectures (which of course, are big endian). >Then perform that analysis on all architectures to make a more better use of >energy. And that's it. It's so simple. Why didn't I think of it.
