frantisek holop <minusf <at> obiit.org> writes: > who decides what is idiotic? you?
What? > yeah, and as i said, that doesn't mean it has to hurt the eye. > making information nice and readable is not a sin. How is it not readable already? > pretty html and a nice website is maybe not interesting for > _you_ but nevertheless it is quite a challenge if you haven't > noticed. I disagree. Writing good code and documentation is a challenge. Expecting developers to stop doing that so that they can fix something that isn't even broken is petty and retarded. > if you are sent away right at the beginning, what's the point? What? > expressing an opinion is still a contribution. No, it isn't. Especially when your opinion counts for nothing because you've contributed nothing else. Anyone can tell somebody else what they should be doing, it's called being an asshole. > without that, openbsd would be much poorer. No, it wouldn't. In fact it would probably be a lot better off without, for example, people polluting the mailing lists with their incesant whining about something as trivial as how pretty a website looks. > i realize this thread brings nothing really new and annoys > the hell out of the devs. Then why don't you do them a favour and SHUT THE FUCK UP. > but i think it's important that the more "arty" people here > get these questions answered and be in the archives. They already have been. > and i still don't understand why we have to be ashamed of > the openbsd site. it is not a commercial product, but that > still doesn't mean it has to be ugly. or at least valid > ugly html. Ahh, the royal "we". The developers clearly aren't ashamed of it and I don't see why they should give a shit that you apparently are.
