On Fri, 20 May 2016 03:50:51 +0300 li...@wrant.com wrote: > Interesting, the moment some other systems started swapping designs, > the moment their public knew they've sold out and commercialised in.
This is a good point; I have certainly noticed this on a lot of other sites and projects. As soon as they "upgrade" to "Web 2.0" (with all the image-buttons-for-links, rounded corners, low-contrast text, JavaScript galore, etc), it's easy to predict the fate of that project. > > For instance, AsiaBSDCon is listed 12 times. Maybe it would be a > > better layout to group by that event. > > No, historic list it is, these things happen over time. You want > reorder, do it local after retrieval, think before posting please. To add to that, they *are* grouped by event. AsiaBSDCon 2015 is not the same as AsiaBSDCon 2012, for example. And the list is in chronological order anyway, which is probably the best order for this kind of list. > > > As I said, I'm no web dev--just a user of it for a long time. > > Other users exist, and they go back many years in time with the > system. > And on that note, there are over 7 billion people on this planet. You can't please everyone. Change the website, and people will complain. Keep the website the way it was before, people will complain.
