On Mon, Nov 6, 2017, at 03:28 PM, Ywe Cærlyn wrote: > First contribution: You should focus on the 3-clause licence. The two > 2-clause tries to be GNU, and that is a mistake I think.
OK, you had me up till here and then this 'Contribution". Is this an attempt at humor? Last time I checked all of the GNU licenses were about 14 pages long of legalese. How is the simpler shorter 2 clause license more like GNU? Sounds like a troll...
