Oh, one more thing. The joke threads are supposed to be reserved for Fridays. Since you're new you probably didn't know that.
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017, at 12:04 AM, Eric Furman wrote: > OK, my understanding of English must be broken because > I do not understand any of this. > I just wanted to warn you off starting any discussions about > BSD vs GNU licensing schemes. Are minds are closed on > this topic. > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017, at 11:44 PM, Ywe Cærlyn wrote: > > So archaically speaking, that is your biggest security issue right there. > > For instance, if you eat much kebabs, your stomach sings The Quran, and > > unfortunately "Mohammed and the companions". > > If you eat much pizza, it sings The Bible, and "Jesus died for your > > sins". > > Now to equalize this, and get Transcendent Truth, for each 3 pizzas, eat > > 1 kebab. > > And you are archaically correct. - There is just one deity, as all > > original monotheism teaches. Then you should be at security with The > > Chief, justice prevail, and obtuseness conquered. > > > > Peace. > > > > Den 11/7/2017 05:10, skrev Ywe Cærlyn: > > > As opposed to say, if you have ever had a moment of Mindful Zen, and > > > thought of Transcendent Trueness. It is a "song" a bit more like > > > "OpenBSD" and "3-clause licence". In other words, 1:1 reality. ;) That > > > is why I got interested in OpenBSD instead. > > > > > > Peace. > > > > > > Den 11/7/2017 04:49, skrev Ywe Cærlyn: > > >> Yes. I actually had a look a linux earlier. And found for instance a > > >> 10ms filter in cpu measurement. I mean, then you haven´t really > > >> understood what available resources in a computer is.. And in for > > >> instance the LADSPA plugins, is tons of pointer variables. The real > > >> song of the GNU licence is this. And "thou shall make no money". That > > >> is why it is really going nowhere. WIth the 2 clause licence, you > > >> hear a little bit of that song.. Just a warning, from someone who has > > >> seen real obtusity in code. > > >> > > >> Den 11/7/2017 02:57, skrev Eric Furman: > > >>> On Mon, Nov 6, 2017, at 03:28 PM, Ywe Cærlyn wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> First contribution: You should focus on the 3-clause licence. The two > > >>>> 2-clause tries to be GNU, and that is a mistake I think. > > >>> OK, you had me up till here and then this 'Contribution". > > >>> Is this an attempt at humor? Last time I checked all of the > > >>> GNU licenses were about 14 pages long of legalese. > > >>> How is the simpler shorter 2 clause license more like GNU? > > >>> Sounds like a troll... > > >>> > > >> > > > > > >
