Hi Philip,
Thanks very much for your time and effort!
The following is the command output:
$ readelf -Wl /usr/local/bin/egdb | awk '/RANDOM/{print ($5+0)/1024}'
88.4844
The same as yours.
Honestly, I am not sure whether the package is for -stable or -current.
After installation, I just add following config in /etc/installurl:
$ cat /etc/installurl
https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD
Then I use "pkg_add -u" sometimes. Doesn't
https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD guarantee it selects correct
packages? Or I miss something?
Thanks very much in advance!
Best Regards
Nan Xiao
On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 1:08 PM, Philip Guenther <guent...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 6:31 PM Nan Xiao <xiaonan830...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks very much for your time and patience. I run "syspatch" command
>> regularly, so it should be 6.3-stable.
>>
>>
>> My full dmesg output is here:
>
> ...
> Okay, nothing weird in there.
>
>
>> And full ouput of "vmstat -m":
>
>
> Nothing stands out in that output either, with nothing showing failures or
> consuming much more than might be expected.
>
> So, I'm back to my theory that the programs that are failing to run for you
> are from packages built for -current and not -stable and have
> PT_OPENBSD_RANDOMIZE segments larger than are permitted by -stable.
>
> For example, the gdb-7.12.1p2 package in -current has an 88kB
> PT_OPENBSD_RANDOMIZE segment:
>
> : morgaine; readelf -Wl /usr/local/bin/egdb | awk '/RANDOM/{print
> ($5+0)/1024}
> 88.4844
> : morgaine;
>
> That's bigger than what a -stable kernel will permit.
>
> So, what's the output of that command for the egdb binary that fails for
> you, and how confident are you that it's from a -stable package and not a
> -current package?
>
>
> Philip Guenther
>
