for APU it’s worth mentioning there are 2 versions in regards of network performance: i210 and i211 NIC chip. i210 (apu2c4) suppose to be faster and more feature-rich, while i211 is “value product”. But since i have only i210AT version and never see head-to-head comparisons there is nothing to backup that claims…
Ref (there are nice tables comparing chips): https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/datasheets/i210-ethernet-controller-datasheet.pdf?asset=9573 https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/datasheets/i211-ethernet-controller-datasheet.pdf?asset=9567 https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/faqs/ethernet-controller-i210-i211-faq.pdf?asset=9597 > Wiadomość napisana przez Shawn Webb <shawn.w...@hardenedbsd.org> w dniu > 04.09.2018, o godz. 02:00: > > The PC-Engines APU devices are wildly popular among the BSD networking > folk, and for good reason. I have a number of APU2 and APU3 systems > deployed. I have one APU4 device deployed. I'll likely deploy another > APU4 device within the next month or two. _ Zbyszek Żółkiewski
