Thanks I have run Edge router for a very long time, but that doesn't fit the marketing bullshit needed. (;
I run my first one as far back as 2015. https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=144747982003992&w=2 And the new Ubiquiti most likely would have better performance compare to many old cisco box possibly running OpenBSD. That's sadly not the goal here. On 6/23/20 1:40 PM, Jordan Geoghegan wrote: > I don't know much about Cisco hardware, but I've had great luck with the > Edgerouter line of products. I've run my home network on an Edgerouter > Pro for several years now without issue, and have dozens of ER4 and > ER-Lite devices out in the wild. > > If you're looking for non-x86 routing solutions, then the Edgerouter is > one of the best bets. > > Regards, > > Jordan > > On 2020-06-23 09:01, Daniel Ouellet wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This might be a bit weird question, but I saw the wireguard being put in >> the kernel in the last few days and I am very existed abut it oppose to >> use the package on it and even today there was more on it. >> >> Many thanks for this!!! >> >> I also know there was effort and some Cisco router can run OpenBSD very >> well, however I have no clue as to any of this stand now. >> >> I don't have a problem to use APU type or other Ubiquit for small >> OpenBSD router, but I wonder about using Cisco instead. The only reason >> is for may be more stability, most likely less performance for sure, but >> less change to have corrupted reboot on power lost, etc. >> >> And sadly for some customers having what they see as computer as router >> don't make them fell good, but seeing a Cisco box kind of wipe out the >> impression. I am not saying it's justify, but perception is sometime >> everything, but if I have my say in it I want all my routers to be >> OpenBSD as much as I can where the needs is not to multiple Gb in speed. >> >> So, any suggestion or updates as to what's now available and hopefully >> in use now. >> >> I really don't care for any special model, or even Juniper, as long as I >> can put OpenBSD on it. >> >> So any feedback as to where it's stand now and what's usable in a >> reliable way would be greatly appreciated. >> >> And yes I know I may well get better performance in some cases with a >> small APU device then a Cisco one, but that's for what we all know may >> not be logical to be used, but for sadly how some clients may fell, not >> knowing any better. >> >> I guess you can see that as some people do security by obstruction, but >> we al know it's not more secure, this is routing by obstruction I guess >> and may be less performant, but achieve comfort obstruction confidence. >> >> I just have no clue if wireguard needs to be run, what can be achieve as >> the CPU in all Cisco device is always under power, we all know that. >> >> This may not go anywhere, however I liked to look even if for nothing >> else then just being fun to do if that can't even be usable. >> >> Many thanks for your time and feedback. >> >> Daniel >> >> PS; And yes, that's most likely stupid I know. Sometime what's used is >> not always what make sense for other reason that are stupid. >> >
