On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 11:47:14AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > >On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 10:44:09AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > >> If people built properly sized machines there would be no problem. > > > >That's a little condescending don't you think? > > Not at all. > > If you don't use a tool as it was intended, you bear the consequences. > > *WE* built the tool. *WE* decided how it works. We even documented > how much resources it typically needs. When people use it > incorrectly, it is their own damn fault. *THEY* can make adjustments. > > But they cannot complain, because they did not pay and even if they > had there is no warrantee. > > There is nothing condescending about telling someone their complaints > about how something works are falling on deaf ears. I don't give a > flying damn if KARL is hurting people who don't provide their machines > with reasonable defaults. It is their own damn fault, and they can > make manual accomodations for their own (completely stupid, IMHO) > decisions. > > In this modern world is has become *impossible* to complain about > any technology which doesn't work like you want, companies who take > money don't give a damn. Here's the shocker: I will not be held > to a higher standard than that. So Peter, your attitude stinks > and your suggestion that anything I've said is "rude" rather than "real", > thgat suggestion of yours is an insult.
OK, I get it you're having a bad day. I'm sorry if I was rude. BTW do you know any operating systems that aren't BSD, Linux that I can continue on? Surely you'd be in the know for this. -peter
