Hi Daniele, if you *really* want user customization as massive as what you keep talking about, OpenBSD is likely the wrong system for you. More than any other system, OpenBSD is optimized for sane defaults, with the goal that users need to customize as little as possible. Providing lots of configuration options for everything is not among the project goals. If you are looking for a system where user configurability is among the central goals, you might want to look at Gentoo Linux or a similar system.
If you *really* want to run on hardware so tiny that you worry about 100 MB of disk space below /usr/local/, again, OpenBSD is likely the wrong system for you in 2023 (i did run an OpenBSD firewall on 24 MB of RAM and 200 MB of disk grand total in 2002, but this is no longer 2002). Sure, OpenBSD still comes with a smaller footprint than many other general purpose systems - but if you want to go *that* tiny, you might want to look at Alpine Linux, which is optimized for extremely small hardware, or at similar systems. Daniele B. wrote on Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 09:13:54PM +0200: > Indeed, I point you out prbs in the hope to help Right now, you are certainly not helping anything. Rather, you are distracting developers. What you are pointing out are not "problems" but a pair of feet looking similar to swiss cheese after extensive use of a shotgun, and you keep talking about plans to apply the same treatment to your knees and your belly as well. By now, it is abundantly clear you lack the basic skills you would need to deviate from the default OpenBSD configuration even in simple ways, let alone to identify problems in OpenBSD (which do exist). Yours, Ingo -- Ingo Schwarze <schwa...@usta.de> http://www.openbsd.org/ <schwa...@openbsd.org> http://mandoc.bsd.lv/ <schwa...@mandoc.bsd.lv>
