I just completed to clean my system looking sysclean output on a spare stick. I gained something mostly from /usr/lib but neither a lot of stuff. As someone has shared with me some data, its amd64 partition size I want to show you this from my *cleaned* system:
MrCleaner# pwd /usr MrCleaner# du -h -d 1 235M ./lib 629M ./bin 1.9M ./games 47.7M ./include 52.7M ./libdata 84.3M ./libexec 612K ./mdec 19.9M ./sbin 730M ./share 449M ./X11R6 2.0K ./src 2.0K ./obj 2.0K ./xobj 7.0G ./local 9.2G . with /usr (2.2G used of 3G) and /usr/local (7G used of 9.6G) I'm still not sure if with this layout I can do a sysupgrade. But more importantly I believe that the difference between 1.5G and 2.2G used space is something it needs to be noticed. -- Daniele Bonini Jan Stary <h...@stare.cz> wrote: > On Aug 13 04:37:25, my2...@has.im wrote: > > - /usr/local/share/gtk-doc (=131MB), html doc completed of some vary > > .png files.. I guess this could be not only an endemic problem > > of my stick as gtk-doc is not installed here: I'm not in the need > > of GTK C code documentation > > - /usr/local/share/doc (=118MB) > > So you have /usr/local under the /usr filesystem. > Make /usr/local separate. Chances are that's what's > filling your /usr, which by itself is pretty small. > > > - what about /usr/local/share/gir-1.0 (70M) ? > > If you worry about 70MB dirs, you are wasting your time, > and everyone else's. Just reinstall /usr/local on a separate > 10GB partition and be done with it. It costs almost nothing. > > > I'd like almost to delete ./gtk-doc and move ./doc to eg. /home/ > > (with sensibly more space) with a link to among the toppings.. ;D > > Stop wasting time. >
