On 3/19/07, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So isn't it rather hypocritical to claim GPL license is bad and BSD license is good and ship operating system with GPLed code? How do you feel about having pro-GPL operating system? Why do you lie to your users by having 'BSD' in operating system's name?
for those that care, openbsd's license policy is very clear. http://www.openbsd.org/policy.html this page is linked to from the word "free" on the front page. it also hasn't changed in a long time. now, if you go to http://www.freebsd.org/about.html, you'll find the freebsd is free section. it's funny that "free of charge" is linked, but "comes with full source code" is not.
