This isnt a question of him being wrong, its a question of HOW IT WAS HANDLED. Get it?
The simple courtesy of privately emailing someone would have taken 30 seconds and would have saved everyone a bunch of time, energy, and embarrassment. On 4/5/07, Andris Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 4/5/07, Daniel Ouellet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Andris Delfino wrote: > > > What's wrong? They protect their license. Period. > > > > Did you read the full tread first before you wrote this? Did you look at > > the code in CVS, did you even see Marcus reply and why? > > > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/1573 > > > > I don't think you did! > > > > He sure did a hell of a huge amount of work that was his, and original > > for your own benefit, and the only mistakes he may have done was to try > > to work on it faster then he may should have and wrongly include > > temporary files to help in the process! > > > > Should he had finish his work in a later time and not try to make this > > available sooner to us, then nothing would have been said on this. > > > > In any case a simple private email to him directly would have been the > > decent human being things to do, but I guess you don't even get that do > you? > > > > Just like I said before. > > > > Where the hell is the open community is going these days, I have no > > clue... Look to me it sure enjoy destroy itself for sure. > > > > I am lost for words! > > > > > > Yes, and he was wrong. He shouldn't base his work in copylefted > software (if he intend to release the result as non-copylefted). > > Licenses are licenses.